想要通過考試就離不開海量試題的訓(xùn)練，只有這樣才能熟悉試題的類型和方向，真正達(dá)到實(shí)戰(zhàn)的效果。整理了雅思寫作7分范文：高齡人口，快來看看吧！希望能幫助到你~更多相關(guān)訊息請關(guān)注！
The aging population is going to become a major concern particularly in
more developed countries, but this should not be viewed as something threatening
to society. It is a blessing for any individual to live a long and healthy life,
only that it could indicate that the responsibilities of caring for the elderly
in the future may partly fall on the younger generation. The questions refer
especially to how the younger generation could provide answers that are able to
move society forward, taking into account a number of social and economic
effects on the nation as a whole.
As the proportion of older people is steadily increasing, there are doubts
over changes regarding the structure of a modern society. A possible change may
the distribution of years of expected lifespan on the social scale, now that the
family planning program is in fashion. Then, what will this dramatic shift mean
for social services, such as health caring and pension on retirement? Overall
effects, however, are not clear enough; for instance, how older people's
prolonged lives are to be arranged in the social context? At this point, it is
interesting to know how today's younger generation would re-think their roles in
society if they might live 100 or more and be in good shape? And should working
people in society continue to be retired as usual at 60 (for women) and 65 (for
men)?
Economy-wise, questions also abound. To begin with, what does it mean to a
society in which half of the population is aged over 60 and could partially
remain in active workforce? This being the case, would people still decide to
dedicate their first two decades only to education, the next four decades
exclusively to career and parenting, and the last 40 years solely to leisure,
awaiting eventual death at 100 or so? So, it is up to the younger generation to
make economic sense of people living longer in the future, seeing the aging
population less as a burden than a bonus. In otheer words, if older people could
keep working for more years, gains in people's lifespan should not necessarily
cause economic losses to society. Neither should possible costs of public health
measures, disease preventions, improved living conditions and better medical
interventions be considered as a 'waste of money'.
Inevitably, the phenomenon of the aging population will become a new
reality--socially as well as economically. Both generations, the younger and the
older, could somehow be expected to work together side by side and all members
of society should in diverse ways contribute to the well-being of the whole
country. Besides, on second thought, who is afraid of the responsibility for the
aging population?
The aging population is going to become a major concern particularly in
more developed countries, but this should not be viewed as something threatening
to society. It is a blessing for any individual to live a long and healthy life,
only that it could indicate that the responsibilities of caring for the elderly
in the future may partly fall on the younger generation. The questions refer
especially to how the younger generation could provide answers that are able to
move society forward, taking into account a number of social and economic
effects on the nation as a whole.
As the proportion of older people is steadily increasing, there are doubts
over changes regarding the structure of a modern society. A possible change may
the distribution of years of expected lifespan on the social scale, now that the
family planning program is in fashion. Then, what will this dramatic shift mean
for social services, such as health caring and pension on retirement? Overall
effects, however, are not clear enough; for instance, how older people's
prolonged lives are to be arranged in the social context? At this point, it is
interesting to know how today's younger generation would re-think their roles in
society if they might live 100 or more and be in good shape? And should working
people in society continue to be retired as usual at 60 (for women) and 65 (for
men)?
Economy-wise, questions also abound. To begin with, what does it mean to a
society in which half of the population is aged over 60 and could partially
remain in active workforce? This being the case, would people still decide to
dedicate their first two decades only to education, the next four decades
exclusively to career and parenting, and the last 40 years solely to leisure,
awaiting eventual death at 100 or so? So, it is up to the younger generation to
make economic sense of people living longer in the future, seeing the aging
population less as a burden than a bonus. In otheer words, if older people could
keep working for more years, gains in people's lifespan should not necessarily
cause economic losses to society. Neither should possible costs of public health
measures, disease preventions, improved living conditions and better medical
interventions be considered as a 'waste of money'.
Inevitably, the phenomenon of the aging population will become a new
reality--socially as well as economically. Both generations, the younger and the
older, could somehow be expected to work together side by side and all members
of society should in diverse ways contribute to the well-being of the whole
country. Besides, on second thought, who is afraid of the responsibility for the
aging population?