為了方便大家的學(xué)習(xí)，順利通過雅思考試，為大家精心整理了雅思考官級9分范文：保護野生動物是浪費，供大家參考！將為大家發(fā)布最新、最專業(yè)的雅思考試機經(jīng)及解析，歡迎參考閱讀。
范文：
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of
wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with
this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the
21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of
humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means
that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any
species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals
die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in
order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for
us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of
resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the
survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also
crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb
carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas,
the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the
costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we
maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals
should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect
them.
(269 words, band 9)
范文：
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of
wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with
this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the
21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of
humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means
that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any
species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals
die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in
order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for
us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of
resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the
survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also
crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb
carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas,
the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the
costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we
maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals
should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect
them.
(269 words, band 9)