通往成功的路是奮斗，一路上我們應(yīng)不停止一日努力，不放棄一切機(jī)會，不報(bào)一絲僥幸心理，踏實(shí)學(xué)習(xí)，堅(jiān)持積累，雅思考官級9分范文：藝術(shù)家誰來資助，你要認(rèn)真對待哦。
題目是Some people think that governments should give financial support to
creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative
artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give
your own opinion.
范文：
People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While
some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe
that money for art projects should come from both governments and other
sources.
Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there
are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city
centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures
in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These
artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people
about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and
tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce
this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less
interesting and attractive.
On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government
funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more
important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education,
healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public
services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of
creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this
opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should
therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on
alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is
sometimes necessary.
題目是Some people think that governments should give financial support to
creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative
artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give
your own opinion.
范文：
People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While
some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe
that money for art projects should come from both governments and other
sources.
Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there
are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city
centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures
in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These
artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people
about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and
tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce
this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less
interesting and attractive.
On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government
funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more
important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education,
healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public
services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of
creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this
opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should
therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on
alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is
sometimes necessary.