His function is analogous to that of a judge, who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a manner as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.
詞匯突破：
analogous 類似于
Obligation 義務
Manner 方式
Reason 推理
Reveal 揭示(在這個句子中翻譯為“展示”)
Function 在這個語境中應該是“職責”
句子主干：His function is analogous to that of a judge.
(各位在問為什么要有that of; analogous是有比較含義的詞，所以比較對象要工整!that=function)
其他成分：who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a manner as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.定語從句
微觀分析：who=judge 或者就是前面的he,因為兩人的職責是類似的所以指代誰都是一樣的。
這個部分的難點在于你要識別出revealing的賓語
revealing the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.
in as obvious a manner as possible做的是狀語，回想一下昨天我們是怎么處理的：
in a manner as obvious as possible
用盡可能明顯的方式;
( ，in the manner of a hero ,用一種英雄的方式)
后面的which led him to his decision修飾過程，你問我為什么不修飾reasoning，你自己翻譯就知道不通順了，這是語法解決不了的二義性，從語法上講都是可以的時候就只有看語境了。
參考譯文：他的職責與法官相似，他必須承擔這樣的責任：用盡可能明了的方式來展示自己做出決定的推理過程。
詞匯突破：
analogous 類似于
Obligation 義務
Manner 方式
Reason 推理
Reveal 揭示(在這個句子中翻譯為“展示”)
Function 在這個語境中應該是“職責”
句子主干：His function is analogous to that of a judge.
(各位在問為什么要有that of; analogous是有比較含義的詞，所以比較對象要工整!that=function)
其他成分：who must accept the obligation of revealing in as obvious a manner as possible the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.定語從句
微觀分析：who=judge 或者就是前面的he,因為兩人的職責是類似的所以指代誰都是一樣的。
這個部分的難點在于你要識別出revealing的賓語
revealing the course of reasoning which led him to his decision.
in as obvious a manner as possible做的是狀語，回想一下昨天我們是怎么處理的：
in a manner as obvious as possible
用盡可能明顯的方式;
( ，in the manner of a hero ,用一種英雄的方式)
后面的which led him to his decision修飾過程，你問我為什么不修飾reasoning，你自己翻譯就知道不通順了，這是語法解決不了的二義性，從語法上講都是可以的時候就只有看語境了。
參考譯文：他的職責與法官相似，他必須承擔這樣的責任：用盡可能明了的方式來展示自己做出決定的推理過程。