Youth crime contributes significantly to the increasing crime rate in the modern society. There is no doubt that these young delinquents take their punishment, but I prefer in different ways.
The reasons for this phenomenon are worth of scrutiny. In China with the economy booming, pressure from competition at work and business force parents to work hard, leaving insufficient time to their children. Without enough love from the family, these adolescents tend to do something astounding, sometimes slip beyond control. In addition, the one child policy in my country also contributes to higher crime rate because these little “emperors” are brought up in such a way that some of them are self-centered and tolerant of little. When confronted with difficulties or injustice, they are prone to resort to violence. Although spoiled, they have to live up to the high expectation of their parents in the name of love. Under such pressure from the family and school as well, they tend to be rebellious to their parents and teachers, in some cases the society as a whole.
When teenagers commit crimes, surely penalty should be given, especially the youth who commit serious crimes such as homicide or rape. No one should be excluded from justice, and justice has to be served. Depriving criminals of their freedom by imprisoning them, no matter how old they are, is the most effective measure to prevent crime and protect the lawful civilians in the society. Violent teenagers are as dangerous as their mature counterparts, hence should be put behind bars until they are no longer a threat to the public security.
On the other hand, most teenager crimes are minor, like vandalism, fighting or theft which does not do serious harm to victims. The immature behave in an illegal but less violent manner mostly for fun, or to show their courage to impress their peers or to attract their busy parents’ eyes. In these cases, they should be given some opportunities to be corrected and eventually come back to the right track rather than being judged as adults who commit crime deliberately with full awareness of the consequences of their conduct. Instead of being jailed, young lawbreakers can be forced to repair the damage to their neighborhood or local community, and offer their sincere apology to the victims or do some community duties such as serving the elderly in local nursing home.
To sum up, I personally reckon that political policy and the utilitarianism of educators should be responsible for today’s increasing juvenile delinquency. I agree with harsh treatment under the circumstances of serious crime. But if the offence is not major, adolescent criminals should be given alternative punishments like community service in order to reform them to be lawful citizens rather than being jailed.
青少年犯罪增加的一個(gè)重要原因在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)犯罪率。毫無疑問,這些年輕的罪犯的懲罰,但我更喜歡以不同的方式。
這一現(xiàn)象的原因是值得的審查。在中國經(jīng)濟(jì)蓬勃發(fā)展,競爭的壓力在工作和商業(yè)力量的父母努力工作,讓自己的孩子足夠的時(shí)間。沒有足夠的愛從家庭,這些青少年傾向于做一些驚人的,有時(shí)無法控制。此外,獨(dú)生子女政策在我的國家也會(huì)導(dǎo)致更高的犯罪率,因?yàn)檫@些小“皇帝”中長大,有些自私和寬容的。當(dāng)遇到困難或不公正,他們?nèi)菀自V諸暴力。雖然被寵壞了,他們必須不辜負(fù)父母的高期望的愛。在這樣的家庭和學(xué)校的壓力,他們往往是叛逆的父母和老師,在某些情況下,社會(huì)作為一個(gè)整體。
當(dāng)青少年犯罪,懲罰應(yīng)給予肯定,尤其是青年殺人、強(qiáng)*等嚴(yán)重犯罪。任何人都不應(yīng)被排除在正義和司法服務(wù)。剝奪了罪犯的自由,囚禁他們,無論他們是多大,是的措施來防止犯罪和保護(hù)合法的平民社會(huì)中。暴力的青少年成熟同行一樣危險(xiǎn),因此應(yīng)該被繩之以法,直到他們不再對(duì)公眾安全的威脅。
另一方面,大多數(shù)青少年犯罪是次要的,如破壞,戰(zhàn)爭或盜竊不造成嚴(yán)重傷害的受害者。不成熟的行為非法但不暴力的方式主要是為了好玩,或顯示他們的勇氣打動(dòng)同齡人或吸引他們忙碌的父母的眼睛。在這些情況下,應(yīng)該給他們一些機(jī)會(huì)糾正并最終回到正確的軌道上,而不是判斷與成年人犯罪故意充分意識(shí)到自己行為的后果。而不是監(jiān)禁,年輕的違法者可以強(qiáng)迫去修理損壞的地方社區(qū)或當(dāng)?shù)厣鐓^(qū),并向受害者提供真誠的道歉或做一些社區(qū)義務(wù)服務(wù)等在當(dāng)?shù)仞B(yǎng)老院老年人。
綜上所述,我個(gè)人認(rèn)為,政治政策和功利主義的教育工作者應(yīng)該負(fù)責(zé)今天的青少年犯罪增加。我同意嚴(yán)酷的治療嚴(yán)重罪行的情況下。但如果犯罪不是主要的,青少年罪犯應(yīng)該給社區(qū)服務(wù)等其他懲罰為了改革是合法的公民而不是監(jiān)禁。
The reasons for this phenomenon are worth of scrutiny. In China with the economy booming, pressure from competition at work and business force parents to work hard, leaving insufficient time to their children. Without enough love from the family, these adolescents tend to do something astounding, sometimes slip beyond control. In addition, the one child policy in my country also contributes to higher crime rate because these little “emperors” are brought up in such a way that some of them are self-centered and tolerant of little. When confronted with difficulties or injustice, they are prone to resort to violence. Although spoiled, they have to live up to the high expectation of their parents in the name of love. Under such pressure from the family and school as well, they tend to be rebellious to their parents and teachers, in some cases the society as a whole.
When teenagers commit crimes, surely penalty should be given, especially the youth who commit serious crimes such as homicide or rape. No one should be excluded from justice, and justice has to be served. Depriving criminals of their freedom by imprisoning them, no matter how old they are, is the most effective measure to prevent crime and protect the lawful civilians in the society. Violent teenagers are as dangerous as their mature counterparts, hence should be put behind bars until they are no longer a threat to the public security.
On the other hand, most teenager crimes are minor, like vandalism, fighting or theft which does not do serious harm to victims. The immature behave in an illegal but less violent manner mostly for fun, or to show their courage to impress their peers or to attract their busy parents’ eyes. In these cases, they should be given some opportunities to be corrected and eventually come back to the right track rather than being judged as adults who commit crime deliberately with full awareness of the consequences of their conduct. Instead of being jailed, young lawbreakers can be forced to repair the damage to their neighborhood or local community, and offer their sincere apology to the victims or do some community duties such as serving the elderly in local nursing home.
To sum up, I personally reckon that political policy and the utilitarianism of educators should be responsible for today’s increasing juvenile delinquency. I agree with harsh treatment under the circumstances of serious crime. But if the offence is not major, adolescent criminals should be given alternative punishments like community service in order to reform them to be lawful citizens rather than being jailed.
青少年犯罪增加的一個(gè)重要原因在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)犯罪率。毫無疑問,這些年輕的罪犯的懲罰,但我更喜歡以不同的方式。
這一現(xiàn)象的原因是值得的審查。在中國經(jīng)濟(jì)蓬勃發(fā)展,競爭的壓力在工作和商業(yè)力量的父母努力工作,讓自己的孩子足夠的時(shí)間。沒有足夠的愛從家庭,這些青少年傾向于做一些驚人的,有時(shí)無法控制。此外,獨(dú)生子女政策在我的國家也會(huì)導(dǎo)致更高的犯罪率,因?yàn)檫@些小“皇帝”中長大,有些自私和寬容的。當(dāng)遇到困難或不公正,他們?nèi)菀自V諸暴力。雖然被寵壞了,他們必須不辜負(fù)父母的高期望的愛。在這樣的家庭和學(xué)校的壓力,他們往往是叛逆的父母和老師,在某些情況下,社會(huì)作為一個(gè)整體。
當(dāng)青少年犯罪,懲罰應(yīng)給予肯定,尤其是青年殺人、強(qiáng)*等嚴(yán)重犯罪。任何人都不應(yīng)被排除在正義和司法服務(wù)。剝奪了罪犯的自由,囚禁他們,無論他們是多大,是的措施來防止犯罪和保護(hù)合法的平民社會(huì)中。暴力的青少年成熟同行一樣危險(xiǎn),因此應(yīng)該被繩之以法,直到他們不再對(duì)公眾安全的威脅。
另一方面,大多數(shù)青少年犯罪是次要的,如破壞,戰(zhàn)爭或盜竊不造成嚴(yán)重傷害的受害者。不成熟的行為非法但不暴力的方式主要是為了好玩,或顯示他們的勇氣打動(dòng)同齡人或吸引他們忙碌的父母的眼睛。在這些情況下,應(yīng)該給他們一些機(jī)會(huì)糾正并最終回到正確的軌道上,而不是判斷與成年人犯罪故意充分意識(shí)到自己行為的后果。而不是監(jiān)禁,年輕的違法者可以強(qiáng)迫去修理損壞的地方社區(qū)或當(dāng)?shù)厣鐓^(qū),并向受害者提供真誠的道歉或做一些社區(qū)義務(wù)服務(wù)等在當(dāng)?shù)仞B(yǎng)老院老年人。
綜上所述,我個(gè)人認(rèn)為,政治政策和功利主義的教育工作者應(yīng)該負(fù)責(zé)今天的青少年犯罪增加。我同意嚴(yán)酷的治療嚴(yán)重罪行的情況下。但如果犯罪不是主要的,青少年罪犯應(yīng)該給社區(qū)服務(wù)等其他懲罰為了改革是合法的公民而不是監(jiān)禁。