Passage 10新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比型（專業(yè)性文章）咖啡因提神原理
新觀點(diǎn)（比較特殊，先出現(xiàn)新觀點(diǎn)）Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called “the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth.” Snyder, Daly and Bruns have recently（時(shí)間狀語，很可能是新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比型） proposed that caffeine affect behavior by countering阻礙 the activity in the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical called adenosine. Adenosine normally depresses阻礙 neuron firing神經(jīng)興奮 in many areas of the brain. It apparently does this by inhibiting（重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容）阻礙 the release of neurotransmitters, chemicals that carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next. Like many other agents that affect neuron firing, adenosine must first bind to specific receptors on neuronal membranes. There are at least two classes of these receptors, which have been designated A1 and A2*7. Snyder et al (et al: abbr. (Lat) 以及其他人，等人) propose that caffeine, which is structurally similar to*7B adenosine, is able to bind to both types of receptors, which prevents阻礙 adenosine from attaching there and allows the neurons to fire more readily than they otherwise would.
老觀點(diǎn)For many years（證明了是新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比型）, caffeine’s effects have been attributed to its inhibition阻礙 of the production of phosphodiesterase, an enzyme that breaks down分解 the chemical called cyclic AMP. A number of neurotransmitters exert their effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentrations in target neurons. Therefore（結(jié)論）, prolonged periods at the elevated concentrations, as might be brought about by a phosphodiesterase inhibitor其實(shí)就是指咖啡因, could lead to a greater amount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behavioral stimulation. But Snyder（老觀點(diǎn)的描述中出現(xiàn)新觀點(diǎn)的人名，用來批駁老觀點(diǎn)） et al 理由一point out that the caffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher（比較句） than those that produce stimulation. 理由二Moreover, other compounds that block阻礙 phosphodiesterase’s activity are not stimulants.
新觀點(diǎn)的證據(jù)To buttress支持（=support） their case that caffeine acts instead by preventing抑制 adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared the stimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives with their ability to dislodge排斥 adenosine from its receptors in the brains of mice. （做實(shí)驗(yàn)比較刺激能力和排斥能力）“In general*8B,” they reported（引用人物原話，是重要出題點(diǎn)）, “the ability of the compounds to compete at the receptors correlates with（正相關(guān)性） their ability to stimulate locomotion in the mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at the receptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomotion.” Theophylline（與結(jié)論緊密相連，篇幅小于5行，可以不看）, a close structural relative of caffeine and the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most effective compounds in both regards.
新觀點(diǎn)的例外情況及解釋There were some apparent exceptions*9A（不希望不出現(xiàn)的內(nèi)容，直接跳去看IBMX這種術(shù)語） to the general correlation observed between adenosine-receptor binding and stimulation. One of these was a compound called 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), which bound very well but actually depressed抑制 mouse locomotion. Snyder et al suggests that*9A this is not a major stumbling block (stumbling block: n.障礙物, 絆腳石) to their hypothesis. The problem is that the compound has mixed effects（整個(gè)問題的解答） in the brain*4A, a not unusual*4 occurrence with psychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally known only for its stimulatory effects, displays this property, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to主題題（寫法性）
(A) discuss a plan for investigation of a phenomenon that is not yet fully understood
(B) present two explanations of a phenomenon and reconcile the differences between them
(C) summarize two theories and suggest a third theory that overcomes the problems encountered in the first two
(D) describe an alternative hypothesis and provide evidence and arguments that support it新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比型（D）
(E) challenge the validity of a theory by exposing the inconsistencies and contradictions in it
2. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the theory proposed by Snyder et al?邏輯題（反對(duì)題）（太難了，不做要求）
(A) At very low concentrations in the human brain, both caffeine and theophylline tend to have depressive rather than stimulatory effects on human behavior.
(B) The ability of caffeine derivatives at very low concentrations to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in mouse brains correlates well with their ability to stimulate mouse locomotion at these low concentrations.
(C) The concentration of cyclic AMP in target neurons in the human brain that leads to increased neuron firing can be produced by several different phosphodiesterase inhibitors in addition to caffeine.
(D) The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans.用S批判老觀點(diǎn)的方法（D）
(E) The concentration of IBMX required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in mouse brains is much smaller than the concentration that stimulates locomotion in the mouse.
3. According so Snyder et al, caffeine differs from adenosine in that caffeine
(A) stimulates behavior in the mouse and in humans, whereas adenosine stimulates behavior in humans only
(B) has mixed effects in the brain, whereas adenosine has only a stimulatory effect
(C) increases cyclic AMP concentrations in target neurons, whereas adenosine decreases such concentrations
(D) permits release of neurotransmitters when it is bound to adenosine receptors, whereas adenosine inhibits such release負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系（D）
(E) inhibits both neuron firing and the production of phosphodiesterase when there is a sufficient concentration in the brain, whereas adenosine inhibits only neuron firing
4. In response to experimental results concerning IBMX（最后一段）, Snyder et al contended that it is not uncommon*4 for psychoactive drugs to have
(A) mixed effects in the brain*4A
(B) inhibitory effects on enzymes in the brain
(C) close structural relationships with caffeine
(D) depressive effects on mouse locomotion（A）
(E) the ability to dislodge caffeine from receptors in the brain
5. The passage suggests that Snyder et al believe that if the older theory concerning caffeine’s effects were correct, which of the following would have to be the case?改善題（做法：找老觀點(diǎn)的缺點(diǎn)——*老觀點(diǎn)的兩個(gè)理由，取非；說明兩個(gè)原因不成立）
I. All neurotransmitters would increase the short-term concentration of cyclic AMP in target neurons.
II. Substances other than caffeine that inhibit the production of phosphodiesterase would be stimulants.理由二
III. All concentration levels of caffeine that are high enough to produce stimulation would also inhibit the production of phosphodiesterase.理由一
(A) I only
(B) I and II only
(C) I and III only
(D) II and III only（D）
(E) I, II, and III
6. According to Snyder et al, all of the following compounds can bind to specific receptors（兩類：AD，咖啡因的相似物質(zhì)） in the brain EXCEPT
(A) IBMX
(B) caffeine
(C) adenosine
(D) theophylline（E）
(E) phosphodiesterase
7. Snyder et al suggest that caffeine’s ability to bind to A1 and A2 receptors*7 can be at least partially attributed to（因果） which of the following?直接事實(shí)題
(A) The chemical relationship between caffeine and phosphodiesterase
(B) The structural relationship*7B between caffeine and adenosine
(C) The structural similarity between caffeine and neurotransmitters
(D) The ability of caffeine to stimulate behavior（B）
(E) The natural occurrence of caffeine and adenosine in the brain
8. The author quotes Snyder et al in lines 38-43 most probably in order to舉例作用題（服務(wù)于第三段——提供論據(jù)支持新觀點(diǎn)）
(A) reveal some of the assumptions underlying their theory
(B) summarize*8B a major finding of their experiments
(C) point out that their experiments were limited to the mouse
(D) indicate that their experiments resulted only in general correlations（B）
(E) refute the objections made by supporters of the older theory
9. The last paragraph of the passage performs which of the following functions?
(A) Describes a disconfirming*9A experimental result and reports the explanation*9A given by Snyder et al in an attempt to reconcile this result with their theory.例外的情況及解釋
(B) Specifies the basis for the correlation observed by Snyder et al and presents an explanation in an attempt to make the correlation consistent with the operation of psychoactive drugs other than caffeine.
(C) Elaborates the description of the correlation observed by Snyder et al and suggests an additional explanation in an attempt to make the correlation consistent with the older theory.
(D) Reports inconsistent experimental data and describes the method Snyder et al will use to reanalyze this data.（A）
(E) Provides an example of the hypothesis proposed by Snyder et al and relates this example to caffeine’s properties
新觀點(diǎn)（比較特殊，先出現(xiàn)新觀點(diǎn)）Caffeine, the stimulant in coffee, has been called “the most widely used psychoactive substance on Earth.” Snyder, Daly and Bruns have recently（時(shí)間狀語，很可能是新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比型） proposed that caffeine affect behavior by countering阻礙 the activity in the human brain of a naturally occurring chemical called adenosine. Adenosine normally depresses阻礙 neuron firing神經(jīng)興奮 in many areas of the brain. It apparently does this by inhibiting（重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容）阻礙 the release of neurotransmitters, chemicals that carry nerve impulses from one neuron to the next. Like many other agents that affect neuron firing, adenosine must first bind to specific receptors on neuronal membranes. There are at least two classes of these receptors, which have been designated A1 and A2*7. Snyder et al (et al: abbr. (Lat) 以及其他人，等人) propose that caffeine, which is structurally similar to*7B adenosine, is able to bind to both types of receptors, which prevents阻礙 adenosine from attaching there and allows the neurons to fire more readily than they otherwise would.
老觀點(diǎn)For many years（證明了是新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比型）, caffeine’s effects have been attributed to its inhibition阻礙 of the production of phosphodiesterase, an enzyme that breaks down分解 the chemical called cyclic AMP. A number of neurotransmitters exert their effects by first increasing cyclic AMP concentrations in target neurons. Therefore（結(jié)論）, prolonged periods at the elevated concentrations, as might be brought about by a phosphodiesterase inhibitor其實(shí)就是指咖啡因, could lead to a greater amount of neuron firing and, consequently, to behavioral stimulation. But Snyder（老觀點(diǎn)的描述中出現(xiàn)新觀點(diǎn)的人名，用來批駁老觀點(diǎn)） et al 理由一point out that the caffeine concentrations needed to inhibit the production of phosphodiesterase in the brain are much higher（比較句） than those that produce stimulation. 理由二Moreover, other compounds that block阻礙 phosphodiesterase’s activity are not stimulants.
新觀點(diǎn)的證據(jù)To buttress支持（=support） their case that caffeine acts instead by preventing抑制 adenosine binding, Snyder et al compared the stimulatory effects of a series of caffeine derivatives with their ability to dislodge排斥 adenosine from its receptors in the brains of mice. （做實(shí)驗(yàn)比較刺激能力和排斥能力）“In general*8B,” they reported（引用人物原話，是重要出題點(diǎn)）, “the ability of the compounds to compete at the receptors correlates with（正相關(guān)性） their ability to stimulate locomotion in the mouse; i.e., the higher their capacity to bind at the receptors, the higher their ability to stimulate locomotion.” Theophylline（與結(jié)論緊密相連，篇幅小于5行，可以不看）, a close structural relative of caffeine and the major stimulant in tea, was one of the most effective compounds in both regards.
新觀點(diǎn)的例外情況及解釋There were some apparent exceptions*9A（不希望不出現(xiàn)的內(nèi)容，直接跳去看IBMX這種術(shù)語） to the general correlation observed between adenosine-receptor binding and stimulation. One of these was a compound called 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), which bound very well but actually depressed抑制 mouse locomotion. Snyder et al suggests that*9A this is not a major stumbling block (stumbling block: n.障礙物, 絆腳石) to their hypothesis. The problem is that the compound has mixed effects（整個(gè)問題的解答） in the brain*4A, a not unusual*4 occurrence with psychoactive drugs. Even caffeine, which is generally known only for its stimulatory effects, displays this property, depressing mouse locomotion at very low concentrations and stimulating it at higher ones.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to主題題（寫法性）
(A) discuss a plan for investigation of a phenomenon that is not yet fully understood
(B) present two explanations of a phenomenon and reconcile the differences between them
(C) summarize two theories and suggest a third theory that overcomes the problems encountered in the first two
(D) describe an alternative hypothesis and provide evidence and arguments that support it新老觀點(diǎn)對(duì)比型（D）
(E) challenge the validity of a theory by exposing the inconsistencies and contradictions in it
2. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the theory proposed by Snyder et al?邏輯題（反對(duì)題）（太難了，不做要求）
(A) At very low concentrations in the human brain, both caffeine and theophylline tend to have depressive rather than stimulatory effects on human behavior.
(B) The ability of caffeine derivatives at very low concentrations to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in mouse brains correlates well with their ability to stimulate mouse locomotion at these low concentrations.
(C) The concentration of cyclic AMP in target neurons in the human brain that leads to increased neuron firing can be produced by several different phosphodiesterase inhibitors in addition to caffeine.
(D) The concentration of caffeine required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in the human brain is much greater than the concentration that produces behavioral stimulation in humans.用S批判老觀點(diǎn)的方法（D）
(E) The concentration of IBMX required to dislodge adenosine from its receptors in mouse brains is much smaller than the concentration that stimulates locomotion in the mouse.
3. According so Snyder et al, caffeine differs from adenosine in that caffeine
(A) stimulates behavior in the mouse and in humans, whereas adenosine stimulates behavior in humans only
(B) has mixed effects in the brain, whereas adenosine has only a stimulatory effect
(C) increases cyclic AMP concentrations in target neurons, whereas adenosine decreases such concentrations
(D) permits release of neurotransmitters when it is bound to adenosine receptors, whereas adenosine inhibits such release負(fù)相關(guān)關(guān)系（D）
(E) inhibits both neuron firing and the production of phosphodiesterase when there is a sufficient concentration in the brain, whereas adenosine inhibits only neuron firing
4. In response to experimental results concerning IBMX（最后一段）, Snyder et al contended that it is not uncommon*4 for psychoactive drugs to have
(A) mixed effects in the brain*4A
(B) inhibitory effects on enzymes in the brain
(C) close structural relationships with caffeine
(D) depressive effects on mouse locomotion（A）
(E) the ability to dislodge caffeine from receptors in the brain
5. The passage suggests that Snyder et al believe that if the older theory concerning caffeine’s effects were correct, which of the following would have to be the case?改善題（做法：找老觀點(diǎn)的缺點(diǎn)——*老觀點(diǎn)的兩個(gè)理由，取非；說明兩個(gè)原因不成立）
I. All neurotransmitters would increase the short-term concentration of cyclic AMP in target neurons.
II. Substances other than caffeine that inhibit the production of phosphodiesterase would be stimulants.理由二
III. All concentration levels of caffeine that are high enough to produce stimulation would also inhibit the production of phosphodiesterase.理由一
(A) I only
(B) I and II only
(C) I and III only
(D) II and III only（D）
(E) I, II, and III
6. According to Snyder et al, all of the following compounds can bind to specific receptors（兩類：AD，咖啡因的相似物質(zhì)） in the brain EXCEPT
(A) IBMX
(B) caffeine
(C) adenosine
(D) theophylline（E）
(E) phosphodiesterase
7. Snyder et al suggest that caffeine’s ability to bind to A1 and A2 receptors*7 can be at least partially attributed to（因果） which of the following?直接事實(shí)題
(A) The chemical relationship between caffeine and phosphodiesterase
(B) The structural relationship*7B between caffeine and adenosine
(C) The structural similarity between caffeine and neurotransmitters
(D) The ability of caffeine to stimulate behavior（B）
(E) The natural occurrence of caffeine and adenosine in the brain
8. The author quotes Snyder et al in lines 38-43 most probably in order to舉例作用題（服務(wù)于第三段——提供論據(jù)支持新觀點(diǎn)）
(A) reveal some of the assumptions underlying their theory
(B) summarize*8B a major finding of their experiments
(C) point out that their experiments were limited to the mouse
(D) indicate that their experiments resulted only in general correlations（B）
(E) refute the objections made by supporters of the older theory
9. The last paragraph of the passage performs which of the following functions?
(A) Describes a disconfirming*9A experimental result and reports the explanation*9A given by Snyder et al in an attempt to reconcile this result with their theory.例外的情況及解釋
(B) Specifies the basis for the correlation observed by Snyder et al and presents an explanation in an attempt to make the correlation consistent with the operation of psychoactive drugs other than caffeine.
(C) Elaborates the description of the correlation observed by Snyder et al and suggests an additional explanation in an attempt to make the correlation consistent with the older theory.
(D) Reports inconsistent experimental data and describes the method Snyder et al will use to reanalyze this data.（A）
(E) Provides an example of the hypothesis proposed by Snyder et al and relates this example to caffeine’s properties