本文主要講解GRE作文相關(guān)內(nèi)容，希望能幫助童鞋們提高寫作能力。出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)liuxue86.com編輯部敬上。
題目：
Fifteen years ago， Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time， Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes， and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers， looking at this dramatic rise in grades， believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement； as a result， Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs， Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
15 年前，Omega 大學(xué)實施了一項新措施，鼓勵學(xué)生對所有教授的教學(xué)效果進(jìn)行評價。從那以后，Omega 的教授開始給予學(xué)生更高的分?jǐn)?shù)，Omega 的學(xué)生成績總平均上升了30%.未來的雇主顯然認(rèn)為Omega 的分?jǐn)?shù)貶值了，無法反映出學(xué)生的真實能力。因此，Omega 的畢業(yè)生找工作時沒有鄰近的Alpha 大學(xué)畢業(yè)生成功。為使Omega 畢業(yè)生找到好工作，我們應(yīng)立即停止學(xué)生對教授的評價。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
感謝您閱讀《argument12 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
題目：
Fifteen years ago， Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time， Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes， and overall student grade averages at Omega have risen by 30 percent. Potential employers， looking at this dramatic rise in grades， believe that grades at Omega are inflated and do not accurately reflect student achievement； as a result， Omega graduates have not been as successful at getting jobs as have graduates from nearby Alpha University. To enable its graduates to secure better jobs， Omega University should terminate student evaluation of professors.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
中文翻譯：
15 年前，Omega 大學(xué)實施了一項新措施，鼓勵學(xué)生對所有教授的教學(xué)效果進(jìn)行評價。從那以后，Omega 的教授開始給予學(xué)生更高的分?jǐn)?shù)，Omega 的學(xué)生成績總平均上升了30%.未來的雇主顯然認(rèn)為Omega 的分?jǐn)?shù)貶值了，無法反映出學(xué)生的真實能力。因此，Omega 的畢業(yè)生找工作時沒有鄰近的Alpha 大學(xué)畢業(yè)生成功。為使Omega 畢業(yè)生找到好工作，我們應(yīng)立即停止學(xué)生對教授的評價。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，討論還需要何種具體的證據(jù)才能更好的評估上面的論證，并解釋這個證據(jù)是如何強(qiáng)化/削弱這篇文章的論證的。
感謝您閱讀《argument12 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。