GRE作文是中國學(xué)生比較頭痛的，經(jīng)常準(zhǔn)備很多時(shí)間最后還是只得到3.5。我之所以得到6分，個(gè)人認(rèn)為我的文風(fēng)比較淳樸扎實(shí)，有科學(xué)性，寫的思路比較廣(正、反、特)，字?jǐn)?shù)也比較多(I800+、A700+)。
5.The following appeared in the business section of a newspaper.
"Given that the number of people in our country with some form of arthritis is expected to rise from 40 million to 60 million over the next twenty years, pharmaceutical companies that produce drugs for the treatment of arthritis should be very profitable. Many analysts believe that in ten years Becton Pharmaceuticals, which makes Xenon, the best-selling drug treatment for arthritis, will be the most profitable pharmaceutical company. But the patent on Xenon expires in three years, and other companies will then be able to produce a cheaper version of the drug. Thus, it is more likely that in ten years the most profitable pharmaceutical company will be Perkins Pharmaceuticals, maker of a new drug called Xylan, which clinical studies show is preferred over Xenon by seven out of ten patients suffering from the most extreme cases of arthritis."
A、作者的所有推理都是建立在一開始的假設(shè)上的，如果該假設(shè)不成立，則作者其他所有推理都將不成立，而在未來風(fēng)濕病患者增長40 million到60 million作者并沒有給出可以讓人信服的證據(jù)，因此該假設(shè)很可能不成立。
B、即使該假設(shè)成立，B公司也不一定能夠抓到高利潤。根據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)常識，利潤等于銷售額減去成本。如果B公司開發(fā)以及生產(chǎn)X藥的成本很高，那么即使銷售不錯(cuò)，也可能不盈利，甚至虧本。
C、對于P公司的X(Xylan)藥，臨床研究的樣本數(shù)太少，只有10個(gè)病人，而且這10個(gè)病人都是嚴(yán)重的風(fēng)濕病，以此該樣本并不能夠代表所有的風(fēng)濕病患者。
D、即使能夠代表所有的風(fēng)濕病患者，也存在著利潤問題，高成本的話就不一定能夠產(chǎn)生利潤了。
6.The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe.
"A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, our proposed club, the C Note, would have the local market all to itself. Plus, jazz is extremely popular in Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's jazz festival last summer, several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe, and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is 'Jazz Nightly,' which airs every weeknight. Finally, a nationwide study indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment. It is clear that the C Note cannot help but make money."
A、首先，該全國范圍的調(diào)查樣本選取是否足夠隨機(jī)，如果不隨機(jī)，則調(diào)查結(jié)果就不能夠得出人均花費(fèi)$1,000在爵士音樂娛樂上的結(jié)論。
B、即使該調(diào)查足夠隨機(jī)，那也是全國范圍的調(diào)查結(jié)論，對于M地區(qū)并不一定成立。M地區(qū)的居民花費(fèi)在爵士音樂娛樂上的錢不足$1,000。正如作者所說，M地區(qū)的居民喜歡“Jazz Nightly”的廣播節(jié)目，因此該地區(qū)的居民可能更喜歡收聽免費(fèi)的廣播，而不是去俱樂部等地方進(jìn)行消費(fèi)。
C、即使M地區(qū)的居民也年均花費(fèi)$1,000在爵士娛樂上，也不一定會去M地區(qū)的C Note爵士音樂俱樂部。目前的俱樂部雖然遠(yuǎn)，但并不代表人們不去?？赡茉摼銟凡凯h(huán)境比較好，爵士音樂純正，人們喜歡去那里。
D、即使人們?nèi) Note，也不一定能夠保證C Note能賺錢。利潤等于收入減去成本，而作者忽視了成本中一個(gè)很重要且很大的成本——品牌成本。C Note創(chuàng)立之初，一定會需要大筆的資金進(jìn)行品牌宣傳。
E、另外，有名的爵士藝人住在M地區(qū)，并不代表他們會在M地區(qū)進(jìn)行表演。100,000參加M地區(qū)的爵士歡慶，并不能夠說明爵士樂在M地區(qū)很受歡迎，人們?nèi)ツ抢锟赡苁瞧渌?，例如追星。即使說明人們喜歡爵士樂，那也是去年夏天了，并不表示今后也是如此。
感謝您閱讀《argument提綱（3） 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
5.The following appeared in the business section of a newspaper.
"Given that the number of people in our country with some form of arthritis is expected to rise from 40 million to 60 million over the next twenty years, pharmaceutical companies that produce drugs for the treatment of arthritis should be very profitable. Many analysts believe that in ten years Becton Pharmaceuticals, which makes Xenon, the best-selling drug treatment for arthritis, will be the most profitable pharmaceutical company. But the patent on Xenon expires in three years, and other companies will then be able to produce a cheaper version of the drug. Thus, it is more likely that in ten years the most profitable pharmaceutical company will be Perkins Pharmaceuticals, maker of a new drug called Xylan, which clinical studies show is preferred over Xenon by seven out of ten patients suffering from the most extreme cases of arthritis."
A、作者的所有推理都是建立在一開始的假設(shè)上的，如果該假設(shè)不成立，則作者其他所有推理都將不成立，而在未來風(fēng)濕病患者增長40 million到60 million作者并沒有給出可以讓人信服的證據(jù)，因此該假設(shè)很可能不成立。
B、即使該假設(shè)成立，B公司也不一定能夠抓到高利潤。根據(jù)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)常識，利潤等于銷售額減去成本。如果B公司開發(fā)以及生產(chǎn)X藥的成本很高，那么即使銷售不錯(cuò)，也可能不盈利，甚至虧本。
C、對于P公司的X(Xylan)藥，臨床研究的樣本數(shù)太少，只有10個(gè)病人，而且這10個(gè)病人都是嚴(yán)重的風(fēng)濕病，以此該樣本并不能夠代表所有的風(fēng)濕病患者。
D、即使能夠代表所有的風(fēng)濕病患者，也存在著利潤問題，高成本的話就不一定能夠產(chǎn)生利潤了。
6.The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe.
"A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise. Currently, the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away; thus, our proposed club, the C Note, would have the local market all to itself. Plus, jazz is extremely popular in Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's jazz festival last summer, several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe, and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is 'Jazz Nightly,' which airs every weeknight. Finally, a nationwide study indicates that the typical jazz fan spends close to $1,000 per year on jazz entertainment. It is clear that the C Note cannot help but make money."
A、首先，該全國范圍的調(diào)查樣本選取是否足夠隨機(jī)，如果不隨機(jī)，則調(diào)查結(jié)果就不能夠得出人均花費(fèi)$1,000在爵士音樂娛樂上的結(jié)論。
B、即使該調(diào)查足夠隨機(jī)，那也是全國范圍的調(diào)查結(jié)論，對于M地區(qū)并不一定成立。M地區(qū)的居民花費(fèi)在爵士音樂娛樂上的錢不足$1,000。正如作者所說，M地區(qū)的居民喜歡“Jazz Nightly”的廣播節(jié)目，因此該地區(qū)的居民可能更喜歡收聽免費(fèi)的廣播，而不是去俱樂部等地方進(jìn)行消費(fèi)。
C、即使M地區(qū)的居民也年均花費(fèi)$1,000在爵士娛樂上，也不一定會去M地區(qū)的C Note爵士音樂俱樂部。目前的俱樂部雖然遠(yuǎn)，但并不代表人們不去?？赡茉摼銟凡凯h(huán)境比較好，爵士音樂純正，人們喜歡去那里。
D、即使人們?nèi) Note，也不一定能夠保證C Note能賺錢。利潤等于收入減去成本，而作者忽視了成本中一個(gè)很重要且很大的成本——品牌成本。C Note創(chuàng)立之初，一定會需要大筆的資金進(jìn)行品牌宣傳。
E、另外，有名的爵士藝人住在M地區(qū)，并不代表他們會在M地區(qū)進(jìn)行表演。100,000參加M地區(qū)的爵士歡慶，并不能夠說明爵士樂在M地區(qū)很受歡迎，人們?nèi)ツ抢锟赡苁瞧渌?，例如追星。即使說明人們喜歡爵士樂，那也是去年夏天了，并不表示今后也是如此。
感謝您閱讀《argument提綱（3） 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。