為了讓大家更好的準備雅思考試，整理了“雅思寫作高分作文精選第4期”供考生參考，請關(guān)注！
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Scientists and the news media are presenting ever more evidence of climate
change. Governmnets cannot be expected to solve this problem. It is the
responsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle to prevent further
damage.
What are your views?
You should write at least 250 words.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your
own knowledge or experience.
Recently scientists worried about climate change have urged governments to
introduce measures to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that are seen as its
main cause. Simoultaneouslty, politicians and environmentalists have urged
individuals to make changes to their lifestyle. I shall argue that governments
and individuals should take join responsibility for this problem.
Firstly, industry accounts for a large proportion of the greenhouse gas
emissions, and this can only be controlled by government action. Measures could
be taken to discourage pollution, such as limiting or taxing the use of fossil
fuels. Alternatively, subsidies could be offered to industries to clean up their
production processes. If these ideas were adopted, I believe that businesses
would regard pollution as a financial issue.
Secondly, only discussion between governments can ensure that solutions are
successful. The Kyoto agreement, for example, tried to reach global agreement on
how to address the problem. Without such co-operating, it seems to me that
efforts to reduce fuel consumption are unlikely to be effective.
However, national and international policies will only secceed if
individuals also change their lifestyle. For example, people could think more
carefully about how they use energy in their homes. By using less electricity,
installing energy-efficient light bulbs and electrical appliances, or investing
in solar panels, individuals can make a real difference.
In addition, I think individual attitudes to transport need to change.
Instead of making short tips by car, people could choose to walk, cycle, or take
a bus. Since cars are a major source of the problem, changing our behaviour in
this area would have a major impact.
In conclusion, I would maintain that only a combination of international
agreement, national policies, and changes in individual behaviour will succeed
in preventing further damage to the environment.
(291 words)
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Scientists and the news media are presenting ever more evidence of climate
change. Governmnets cannot be expected to solve this problem. It is the
responsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle to prevent further
damage.
What are your views?
You should write at least 250 words.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your
own knowledge or experience.
Recently scientists worried about climate change have urged governments to
introduce measures to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that are seen as its
main cause. Simoultaneouslty, politicians and environmentalists have urged
individuals to make changes to their lifestyle. I shall argue that governments
and individuals should take join responsibility for this problem.
Firstly, industry accounts for a large proportion of the greenhouse gas
emissions, and this can only be controlled by government action. Measures could
be taken to discourage pollution, such as limiting or taxing the use of fossil
fuels. Alternatively, subsidies could be offered to industries to clean up their
production processes. If these ideas were adopted, I believe that businesses
would regard pollution as a financial issue.
Secondly, only discussion between governments can ensure that solutions are
successful. The Kyoto agreement, for example, tried to reach global agreement on
how to address the problem. Without such co-operating, it seems to me that
efforts to reduce fuel consumption are unlikely to be effective.
However, national and international policies will only secceed if
individuals also change their lifestyle. For example, people could think more
carefully about how they use energy in their homes. By using less electricity,
installing energy-efficient light bulbs and electrical appliances, or investing
in solar panels, individuals can make a real difference.
In addition, I think individual attitudes to transport need to change.
Instead of making short tips by car, people could choose to walk, cycle, or take
a bus. Since cars are a major source of the problem, changing our behaviour in
this area would have a major impact.
In conclusion, I would maintain that only a combination of international
agreement, national policies, and changes in individual behaviour will succeed
in preventing further damage to the environment.
(291 words)