為了方便大家的學(xué)習(xí)，下面是整理發(fā)布的雅思寫作高分范文賞析：汽油價(jià)格與控制交通污染，歡迎閱讀參考！更多相關(guān)訊息請(qǐng)關(guān)注！
Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and
pollution.
What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you
think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every
major
city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages
companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut
down
waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is
doubtfully
the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such
measures.
The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of
the
population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price
could
invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not
drastically
change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road
is
reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve
traffic
problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs
on
current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation.
In
the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads
and
more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading
cause
of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances
into
the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a
result,
reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh
air.
We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over
industrial
waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and
production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner
energy
resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the
ability
to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is
completely
clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn
such
technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by
increasing
gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without
achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better
transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be
more
effective solutions.
Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve traffic and
pollution.
What extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you
think more effective?
Bad traffic and increasing pollution are thorny issues challenging every
major
city in the globe. To combat such problems, government encourages
companies to mark up gas price in an effort to decrease car use and cut
down
waste gas. However it may temporarily alleviate the problem, but is
doubtfully
the optimal solution.
First of all, consumers and economy would be victimized by such
measures.
The number of cars in a country directly depends on the proportion of
the
population affluent enough to own cars. As a result, raises in gas price
could
invoke hard feelings among this segment of people but would not
drastically
change their behavior in using cars. Even if the number of cars on road
is
reduced due to higher gas cost, this is not the best way to solve
traffic
problems. Such policy would hurt the auto industry, place higher costs
on
current and prospect car owners, and undermine the economy of a nation.
In
the long run, the final way out could be the construction of better roads
and
more effective use of available transport facilities.
Secondly, there is evidence that waste gas from cars is not the leading
cause
of air pollution. The culprit may be the discharge of polluting substances
into
the atmosphere due to the rapidly growing manufacturing industry. As a
result,
reduction of the number of cars would not return us a blue sky and fresh
air.
We could better handle this problem if we could increase control over
industrial
waste discharge and adopt more environmental friendly materials and
production equipment.
Finally, other measures like the application of cheaper and cleaner
energy
resources could also be a better solution. For example, we now have the
ability
to make cell-powered or even solar-powered cars. Such energy is
completely
clean and plentiful. However we still have a very long way to go to turn
such
technologically possible into affordable and practical products.
To conclude, it is not the best way to control traffic and pollution by
increasing
gas price because such action will hurt consumers and economy without
achieving what it is aimed for. Measures such as construction of better
transport facilities and development of new energy resources could be
more
effective solutions.