通往成功的路是奮斗，一路上我們應(yīng)不停止一日努力，不放棄一切機(jī)會(huì)，不報(bào)一絲僥幸心理，踏實(shí)學(xué)習(xí)，堅(jiān)持積累，雅思寫作大作文高分范文：關(guān)于野生動(dòng)物，你要認(rèn)真對(duì)待哦。
題目：
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a
waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
中文翻譯：
野生動(dòng)物在21世紀(jì)沒有地位，所以保護(hù)他們是浪費(fèi)資源。 你在多大程度上同意或不同意?
范文：
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of
wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with
this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the
21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of
humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means
that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any
species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals
die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in
order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for
us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of
resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the
survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also
crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb
carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas,
the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the
costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we
maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals
should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect
them.
題目：
Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a
waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
中文翻譯：
野生動(dòng)物在21世紀(jì)沒有地位，所以保護(hù)他們是浪費(fèi)資源。 你在多大程度上同意或不同意?
范文：
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of
wild animals because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with
this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the
21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of
humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means
that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any
species. Furthermore, there is no compelling reason why we should let animals
die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in
order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is plenty of room for
us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of
resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the
survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also
crucial for human survival. For example, rainforests produce oxygen, absorb
carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth’s climate. If we destroyed these areas,
the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the
costs of conservation. By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we
maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.
In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals
should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect
them.