錯誤思路：將錯誤選項與原文對應(yīng)內(nèi)容粗暴匹配，歸類為與原文相反、無中生有等。
錯誤點和原因：
首先澄清，并非與原文相反和無中生有是錯誤的。這兩點本身沒錯，但如果你的老師分析時到此為止，那么他就是錯的。老師仍舊沒有關(guān)注你的考場行為及給出相應(yīng)的對策。
與原文相反，以前面筆記部分提及的TPO26L2tracemetal為例。文章提到第二種金屬叫做cadmium鎘。該題對應(yīng)原文音頻為3分39秒到4分06秒。題目如下：
What point does the professor make when she talks aboutcadmium being poisonous to humans?
A. That cadmium and zinc can serve a similarfunction in plant enzymes
B. That both cadmium and zinc are rare inplant enzymes
C. That most trace metals are poisonous tohumans
D. That cadmium does not serve any biologicalpurpose
對應(yīng)原文如下：
Kelly, you've got aquestion?
Yeah, I thoughtcadmium was toxic, didn't you say that?
It is poisonous to humans. Um,actually, we used to think that it was toxic to all biological life, that itdidn't serve any biological purpose.But new study suggests that cadmiumcan actually substitute for zinc, that organism can use it instead of zinc whenthere is not enough zinc in their environment.
正確選項為A，你很可能選成了D。原文意思是這種金屬對人是有毒的，我們過去以為它對所有生物體都有毒，沒有任何目的，但新研究表明它可以替代zinc。你應(yīng)該已經(jīng)知道為什么D錯了，它錯在與原文相反是嗎?如果只到這一步，那么恭喜你，下面這幾點你和你的老師都沒有想到。一，很可能你的筆記害了你，記了toxic biological purpose，于是看到D你就選了，按我課上的話說，你連聽懂的機會都沒給自己，就敗給了筆記。二，不懂語氣，不懂預(yù)判。音頻里老師說它“對人”是有毒的，你想到后面會出現(xiàn)什么內(nèi)容了嗎?對!但是它對”別的東西“可能沒毒。之后又說我們“過去”以為它都有毒沒有目的，那么后面就會出現(xiàn)轉(zhuǎn)折，說其實是有目的的!所謂這里的語氣和預(yù)判，就是你料定了后面會出現(xiàn)轉(zhuǎn)折，等著轉(zhuǎn)折信號詞的出現(xiàn)，那么不管具體表述形式是什么，接下來要講的內(nèi)容你已經(jīng)胸有成竹了!所以，如果我來講，我會說D是與原文相反，但我更會講，這道題就是原詞出現(xiàn)，ETS料定你的筆記可能響你料定你可能做不到預(yù)判，于是只要給你設(shè)置明顯原詞的選項，那么你就選定了!
無中生有，顧名思義，原文沒有提到。以TPO45L1為例，主題題對應(yīng)原文如下：
As I was saying, the Renaissance period,which started in the 1400s in Europe, the Renaissance was still a prettyreligious period, and that's reflected in the artwork of that time. But artistswere starting to experiment with a more secular point of view as well, atendency to also use the natural world as the subject matter for their art.
And there were different ways that thesenatural themes were explored.For instance, many artists would paint portraits,while others, although this was more common in Northern Europe, would makelandscapes the subject of their works.
But today i like to consider an influentialItalian Renaissance artist, Leon Battista Alberti, who took a slightlydifferent approach.
之前講的內(nèi)容是文藝復(fù)興時期主題從宗教到世俗的變化，并提到了不同的藝術(shù)呈現(xiàn)方式。今天要講一個意大利藝術(shù)家。主題題錯誤選項A為Reasons for the transition fromreligious to secular themes in Renaissance art。于是很多人說，無中生有啊，哪有提到原因。那么請問，如果A改成thetransition from religious to secular themes in Renaissance art就可以選了嗎?照樣不可以!你get到點了嗎，錯不在reasons，而在是之前內(nèi)容的后半句!也就是說，不管A說的是reason還是Influence還是characteristic還是其它任何blahblah,全部都不能選。那么這道題，由我來講，無中生有沒任何價值，這是在考察你能不能判斷上節(jié)課內(nèi)容!l