綜合寫(xiě)作
Topic 議題：Mustangs has a negative influence on rangeland | ||
Reading | Listening | |
Sub-point 1 分論點(diǎn)1 | The Mustangswill overgraze grass, thus making it expose to rain. Wind would carry the topsoil. | Indeed the Mustangs would graze grass, but they only eat top of plant, so grass will grow again. Besides, fertilizer provided by Mustangs would aid plants’ growth. |
Sub-point2 分論點(diǎn)2 | The land has carrying capacity. | Horses hunt sheep, so the sheep’s population will be reduced. It will not exceed carrying capacity. |
Sub-point 3 分論點(diǎn)3 | Mustangs will degrade the water quality. Therefore, the juvenile fish can not survive. | It is not caused by Mustangs. There were beavers once. Building dam is good for young fish. However, people think that beavers will damage environment, thus killing them. Without beavers, young fish can not survive. |
Sample answer:
The writer and the speakerhave a debate on Mustangs. The writer believes that it will have a negativeinfluence on rangeland, which is opposed by the following lecture.
First, the writer claims thatthe Mustangs will overgraze grass, thus making it expose to rain. Wind wouldcarry the topsoil. While the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle, accordingto him/her, Indeed the Mustangs would graze grass, but they only eat top ofplant, so grass will grow again. Besides, fertilizer provided by Mustangs wouldaid plants’ growth.
Secondly, the passage statesthat the land has carrying capacity.. However, the speaker casts doubt on thisopinion by saying that Horses hunt sheep, so the sheep’s population will bereduced. It will not exceed carrying capacity.
Last, the writer argues that Mustangswill degrade the water quality. Therefore, the juvenile fish can not survive. Bycontrast, in accordance with the speaker, this claim does not hold water. It isnot caused by Mustangs. There were beavers once. Building dam is good for youngfish. However, people think that beavers will damage environment, thus killingthem. Without beavers, young fish can not survive.
獨(dú)立寫(xiě)作：
作文題目： | Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for the older to take risks and explore new things than young people. |
題型類(lèi)別: | 比較類(lèi) |
相關(guān)舊題： | 無(wú) |
寫(xiě)作思路： | 本次寫(xiě)作題目也是相對(duì)比較簡(jiǎn)單的話題，選擇單邊的同學(xué)注意段落內(nèi)部適當(dāng)進(jìn)行雙方的比較。如果想不出三個(gè)互斥的分論點(diǎn)，可以選擇寫(xiě)讓步的結(jié)構(gòu) |
寫(xiě)作指導(dǎo)： | Agree: 單邊 1. 年長(zhǎng)的人已經(jīng)有一定的經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力，能夠有更多的資本去探索新的東西，因?yàn)楹芏嘈碌氖挛镄枰度敫嗟奈锪拓?cái)力。即使不成功，還是有一定的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)，能夠基本的維持自己的基本生活。但是年輕人剛開(kāi)始也沒(méi)有什么資金，一旦失敗了，生活會(huì)過(guò)的很艱難，還會(huì)牽連到自己的家庭。 2. 年長(zhǎng)的人有更多的社會(huì)經(jīng)驗(yàn)和閱歷，當(dāng)他們挑戰(zhàn)新的事物的時(shí)候，有更多的經(jīng)驗(yàn)可以參考。即使沒(méi)有相同的事件，但是也會(huì)根據(jù)自己的經(jīng)歷去合理的推理。但是年輕人通常想問(wèn)題比較片面和單一，做事情也比較沖動(dòng)，因此失敗的概率會(huì)更大。 Disagree 單邊 1. 年輕人接受的知識(shí)更加新，能夠順應(yīng)時(shí)代的潮流。但是老年人思維呆板，想問(wèn)題的角度比較呆板，不容易成功。 2. 年輕時(shí)才有精力去take risk和explore。年輕人精力好，越是新的東西，越需要投入更多的精力，年輕人可以熬夜也可以更多的加班加點(diǎn)，投入更多的時(shí)間。但是年長(zhǎng)的相對(duì)來(lái)說(shuō)體力已經(jīng)跟不上，而且年長(zhǎng)的更加顧及家里的孩子，也希望更加穩(wěn)定的生活，不愿意冒風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 3. 年輕的時(shí)候多冒險(xiǎn)和探索，體驗(yàn)不同的可能性，也會(huì)使得生活更精彩。很多事情即使失敗了，但是都是給我們?nèi)松粝铝撕芏嗪苊篮玫幕貞洝?BR> |
點(diǎn)擊免費(fèi)試聽(tīng)>>> | 點(diǎn)擊免費(fèi)試聽(tīng)>>> |
點(diǎn)擊免費(fèi)試聽(tīng)>>> |