Should government provide equal health care for all the citizens？
The quality of health care a person receives should not depend on the size of their bank balance. The government is responsible for providing a high level of health care for all the citizens.
To what extent do agree or disagree with the above statement？
As more and more people have realized the importance of their quality of life， the issue of health care has received increasing public attention. In my opinion， the government should establish a high-quality health care system for all the citizens， regardless of their gender， occupation and social status. There are three main reasons for this as follows.
The first reason to be taken into account is based on the premise that all men are created equal， which is a generally accepted belief in most countries. Just like equal pay for equal work， uniform. quality and quantity of health care should be given to all citizens， who are believed to be born equal. Similarly， health care can be compared to justice， which is dispensed impartially by judges to all people， without reference to their social backgrounds. Therefore， everyone stands equal under the health care system that is supposed to be provided by the government.
In facet， poor people are those who can receive the most needed benefits from a high level of health care. The poor， who are plagued by financial burdens and chronic unemployment， face especially serious heath problems. Many of them live at the subsistence level and can not afford even the fraction of the exorbitant medical costs if there is no health care for them. In contrast， the rich， with their luxurious and extravagant lifestyle. and the extreme care of their private doctors， often regard the health care as a dispensable thing. Therefore， the idea that the quality of health care people receive should be in proportion to their affluence is totally absurd.
Furthermore， as most citizens are honorable taxpayers and， therefore， make great contribution to the society， whose finances derive largely from taxation， good quality of health care provided by the government should be deemed as a returned favor to these taxpayers. As a matter of fact， all developed nations and many developing ones have incorporated health care into their welfare system， making it one of the fundamental human rights that are granted by the constitution. On the contrary， governments that do not attempt to address people’s health problems are rarely supported by the citizens.
To conclude， health care is an issue that all governments cannot afford to avoid in their day-to-day running of the country. To them， there is no alternative but to provide an excellent system of medical care for all the citizens because the scenario of a country full of diseased and uncared-for people is almost inconceivable.
政府應(yīng)該為所有公民提供平等的醫(yī)療服務(wù)嗎？
一個(gè)人收到的醫(yī)療保健質(zhì)量不應(yīng)該取決于他們的銀行余額的大小。政府負(fù)責(zé)為所有公民提供高水平的醫(yī)療服務(wù)。
在何種程度上同意或不同意上述聲明？
隨著越來越多的人意識(shí)到他們的生活質(zhì)量的重要性，衛(wèi)生保健問題得到了越來越多的關(guān)注。在我看來，政府應(yīng)該建立一個(gè)高品質(zhì)的醫(yī)療保健系統(tǒng)，為所有的公民，不管其性別，職業(yè)和社會(huì)地位。主要原因有以下三個(gè)。
首先要考慮的原因是，所有的人都是平等的，這是大多數(shù)國(guó)家普遍接受的信仰的前提下的前提。就如平等的工作，統(tǒng)一的報(bào)酬。所有的公民，誰被認(rèn)為是出生平等的質(zhì)量和數(shù)量的醫(yī)療保健應(yīng)給予。同樣，保健可以比較公平，這是不公正的法官，所有的人，不論他們的社會(huì)背景。因此，每個(gè)人都主張平等的醫(yī)療制度下，應(yīng)該由政府提供。
在面，窮人是那些誰可以得到最需要的好處，從一個(gè)高層次的醫(yī)療保健。貧困者受到經(jīng)濟(jì)負(fù)擔(dān)和長(zhǎng)期失業(yè)的困擾，面臨特別嚴(yán)重的健康問題。他們中的許多人都生活在生存的水平上，甚至連高醫(yī)療費(fèi)用的比例都不起，如果沒有醫(yī)療照顧的話。與之相比，富人，以其奢華奢侈的生活方式。和他們的私人醫(yī)生的極度關(guān)心，經(jīng)常把醫(yī)療作為一個(gè)可有可無的東西。因此，醫(yī)療保健的質(zhì)量，人們得到的質(zhì)量的觀念應(yīng)該與他們的富裕程度是完全荒謬的。
此外，由于大多數(shù)公民都是可敬的納稅人，因此，對(duì)社會(huì)作出巨大貢獻(xiàn)，其財(cái)政主要來源于稅收，政府所提供的醫(yī)療保健服務(wù)，應(yīng)被視為對(duì)這些納稅人的回報(bào)。事實(shí)上，所有發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和許多發(fā)展中國(guó)家都將醫(yī)療保健納入其福利制度，使其成為憲法賦予的基本人權(quán)之一。相反，政府不試圖解決人們的健康問題，很少受到公民的支持。
得出結(jié)論，醫(yī)療保健是一個(gè)問題，所有的政府都不能在他們的日常運(yùn)行的國(guó)家。對(duì)他們來說，沒有辦法，但提供全民醫(yī)療優(yōu)良的系統(tǒng)因?yàn)槿藗內(nèi)『筒魂P(guān)心國(guó)家的情況是幾乎不可想象的。
The quality of health care a person receives should not depend on the size of their bank balance. The government is responsible for providing a high level of health care for all the citizens.
To what extent do agree or disagree with the above statement？
As more and more people have realized the importance of their quality of life， the issue of health care has received increasing public attention. In my opinion， the government should establish a high-quality health care system for all the citizens， regardless of their gender， occupation and social status. There are three main reasons for this as follows.
The first reason to be taken into account is based on the premise that all men are created equal， which is a generally accepted belief in most countries. Just like equal pay for equal work， uniform. quality and quantity of health care should be given to all citizens， who are believed to be born equal. Similarly， health care can be compared to justice， which is dispensed impartially by judges to all people， without reference to their social backgrounds. Therefore， everyone stands equal under the health care system that is supposed to be provided by the government.
In facet， poor people are those who can receive the most needed benefits from a high level of health care. The poor， who are plagued by financial burdens and chronic unemployment， face especially serious heath problems. Many of them live at the subsistence level and can not afford even the fraction of the exorbitant medical costs if there is no health care for them. In contrast， the rich， with their luxurious and extravagant lifestyle. and the extreme care of their private doctors， often regard the health care as a dispensable thing. Therefore， the idea that the quality of health care people receive should be in proportion to their affluence is totally absurd.
Furthermore， as most citizens are honorable taxpayers and， therefore， make great contribution to the society， whose finances derive largely from taxation， good quality of health care provided by the government should be deemed as a returned favor to these taxpayers. As a matter of fact， all developed nations and many developing ones have incorporated health care into their welfare system， making it one of the fundamental human rights that are granted by the constitution. On the contrary， governments that do not attempt to address people’s health problems are rarely supported by the citizens.
To conclude， health care is an issue that all governments cannot afford to avoid in their day-to-day running of the country. To them， there is no alternative but to provide an excellent system of medical care for all the citizens because the scenario of a country full of diseased and uncared-for people is almost inconceivable.
政府應(yīng)該為所有公民提供平等的醫(yī)療服務(wù)嗎？
一個(gè)人收到的醫(yī)療保健質(zhì)量不應(yīng)該取決于他們的銀行余額的大小。政府負(fù)責(zé)為所有公民提供高水平的醫(yī)療服務(wù)。
在何種程度上同意或不同意上述聲明？
隨著越來越多的人意識(shí)到他們的生活質(zhì)量的重要性，衛(wèi)生保健問題得到了越來越多的關(guān)注。在我看來，政府應(yīng)該建立一個(gè)高品質(zhì)的醫(yī)療保健系統(tǒng)，為所有的公民，不管其性別，職業(yè)和社會(huì)地位。主要原因有以下三個(gè)。
首先要考慮的原因是，所有的人都是平等的，這是大多數(shù)國(guó)家普遍接受的信仰的前提下的前提。就如平等的工作，統(tǒng)一的報(bào)酬。所有的公民，誰被認(rèn)為是出生平等的質(zhì)量和數(shù)量的醫(yī)療保健應(yīng)給予。同樣，保健可以比較公平，這是不公正的法官，所有的人，不論他們的社會(huì)背景。因此，每個(gè)人都主張平等的醫(yī)療制度下，應(yīng)該由政府提供。
在面，窮人是那些誰可以得到最需要的好處，從一個(gè)高層次的醫(yī)療保健。貧困者受到經(jīng)濟(jì)負(fù)擔(dān)和長(zhǎng)期失業(yè)的困擾，面臨特別嚴(yán)重的健康問題。他們中的許多人都生活在生存的水平上，甚至連高醫(yī)療費(fèi)用的比例都不起，如果沒有醫(yī)療照顧的話。與之相比，富人，以其奢華奢侈的生活方式。和他們的私人醫(yī)生的極度關(guān)心，經(jīng)常把醫(yī)療作為一個(gè)可有可無的東西。因此，醫(yī)療保健的質(zhì)量，人們得到的質(zhì)量的觀念應(yīng)該與他們的富裕程度是完全荒謬的。
此外，由于大多數(shù)公民都是可敬的納稅人，因此，對(duì)社會(huì)作出巨大貢獻(xiàn)，其財(cái)政主要來源于稅收，政府所提供的醫(yī)療保健服務(wù)，應(yīng)被視為對(duì)這些納稅人的回報(bào)。事實(shí)上，所有發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和許多發(fā)展中國(guó)家都將醫(yī)療保健納入其福利制度，使其成為憲法賦予的基本人權(quán)之一。相反，政府不試圖解決人們的健康問題，很少受到公民的支持。
得出結(jié)論，醫(yī)療保健是一個(gè)問題，所有的政府都不能在他們的日常運(yùn)行的國(guó)家。對(duì)他們來說，沒有辦法，但提供全民醫(yī)療優(yōu)良的系統(tǒng)因?yàn)槿藗內(nèi)『筒魂P(guān)心國(guó)家的情況是幾乎不可想象的。