china daily 雙語新聞:在華500強(qiáng)企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛呈明顯上升

字號:

英語資源頻道為大家整理的china daily 雙語新聞:在華500強(qiáng)企業(yè)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛呈明顯上升,供大家閱讀參考。
     近日,人民法院民三庭(知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判庭)庭長孔祥俊在接受中國日報專訪時表示,在經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化日益加深,相關(guān)國家貿(mào)易和投資保護(hù)主義有所抬頭的背景下,中國法院一如既往加大對于國外權(quán)利人知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù),法院審理的涉外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件有明顯的上升趨勢。
    Recently, the three division of the Supreme People's Court (tribunal civil intellectual property) President Kong Xiangjun said in an exclusive interview with China Daily, in the deepening of economic globalization, countries trade and investment protectionism under the background of Chinese court, as in the past to increase protection of intellectual property rights in foreign people, court foreign-related intellectual property rights the case has a significant upward trend.
    據(jù)人民法院提供的相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)顯示,2012年,全國法院系統(tǒng)審結(jié)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事一審案件共計83850件,同比2011年上升了44%。其中,共審結(jié)涉外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事一審案件1429件,同比上升了8.18%。
    According to the data provided by the Supreme People's court, in 2012, the court system. First instance IPR civil cases of a total of 83850, up from 44% in 2011. Among them, were settled in foreign-related intellectual property rights 1429 civil cases of first instance, an increase of 8.18%.
    官方數(shù)據(jù)顯示,2013年1至5月,全國法院系統(tǒng)共審結(jié)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事一審案件24544件,比上年同期增長36.6%,其中涉外案件504件。
    Official data shows, 2013 1 to May, the national court system of intellectual property cases of first instance 24544 civil cases, than the same period last year increased 36.6%, of which 504 cases concerning foreign affairs.
    “國際競爭日趨激烈,全球金融危機(jī)的影響日益顯現(xiàn),經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化日益加深與一些國家貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義有所抬頭并存,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域的全球深化和摩擦多發(fā)存在,”他說。
    "The international competition is becoming increasingly fierce, the impact of the global financial crisis looming, the deepening of economic globalization and trade protectionism in some countries rise coexist, in the field of intellectual property and the deepening of multiple global friction exists," he said.
    同時,國內(nèi)一些高科技企業(yè)在市場競爭中感受到了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的重要性,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的意識和能力大為增強(qiáng),相關(guān)司法部門加大了對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)力度,這些都是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件高發(fā)的客觀原因。
    At the same time, some domestic high-tech enterprises in market competition to feel the importance of intellectual property, intellectual property protection consciousness and ability is stronger, the relevant judicial departments to strengthen the protection of intellectual property rights, these are the objective reasons in intellectual property cases.
    據(jù)孔祥俊介紹,法院審理的大多數(shù)有關(guān)涉外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件既包括商標(biāo)、專利和著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域的民事侵權(quán)案件,也包括專利、商標(biāo)領(lǐng)域的授權(quán)確權(quán)類知識產(chǎn)權(quán)行政案件。
    According to Kong Xiangjun introduction, court most of foreign-related intellectual property cases including trademark, patent and copyright field of civil tort cases, including patent, trademark right in the field of authorized administrative intellectual property cases.
    他說,相關(guān)的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)涉外案件主要涉及美國、英國、法國、德國等主要?dú)W盟國家、日本和其他一些國家。
    He said, the relevant intellectual property cases mainly relates to America, Britain, France, Germany and other major European countries, Japan and some other countries.
    孔祥俊說,近幾年來在中國提起知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事訴訟的外國公司主要包括:美國的微軟公司、蘋果公司、通用能源公司、雅培制藥公司、法國的米其林集團(tuán)總公司、軒尼詩公司、德國的寶馬公司,和日本的本田公司等。
    Said Kong Xiangjun, a leading Foreign Company in recent years civil lawsuit of intellectual property in China mainly include: the United States Microsoft Corp, Apple Corp, general energy company, Abbott Laboratories, France's Michelin Group Corporation, Hennessy company, Germany's BMW company, and the Japanese Honda Corporation.
    據(jù)他介紹,法院目前受理的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件涉及領(lǐng)域廣,新案件類型不斷涌現(xiàn)。不但包括著作權(quán)、專利、商標(biāo)、不正當(dāng)競爭和技術(shù)合同等傳統(tǒng)領(lǐng)域的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件,還包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)、計算機(jī)軟件著作權(quán)、民間文學(xué)藝術(shù)、地理標(biāo)志、企業(yè)名稱、馳名商標(biāo)司法認(rèn)定、非物質(zhì)文化遺產(chǎn)和反壟斷等新領(lǐng)域知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件。
    Introduce according to him, the court has accepted the case of intellectual property involves a wide field, new types of cases continue to emerge. Intellectual property cases not only includes the traditional right of patent, copyright, trademark, the field of unfair competition and technology contracts, including network copyright, computer software copyright, folk literature and art, geographical indications, the name of the enterprise, the new field of well-known trademark judicial, intangible cultural heritage and antitrust, intellectual property cases.
    并且,因國際貿(mào)易利益而產(chǎn)生的涉外知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件,即涉國際貿(mào)易知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件明顯出現(xiàn),他說。
    And, due to the international trade interests foreign-related intellectual property cases, i.e. cases involving international trade of intellectual property rights clear, he said.
    “這類案件具有更明顯的國際貿(mào)易利益博弈、跨國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)紛爭等特點(diǎn),體現(xiàn)了權(quán)利人之間的跨國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)競爭和知識產(chǎn)權(quán)布局,有時呈現(xiàn)多國關(guān)聯(lián)訴訟、國內(nèi)外訴訟相互交織和影響的特點(diǎn)?!?BR>    "These cases are international trade interests of the game, the more obvious the transnational intellectual property disputes and other characteristics, embodies the rights between the international intellectual property competition and intellectual property rights arrangement, sometimes present multinational associated litigation, domestic and foreign litigation intertwined and influence characteristics."
    再有,孔祥俊說,國外法院審理的我國老字號品牌在海外被搶注的案件也時有發(fā)生,如“王致和”在德國被搶注,“五糧液”在韓國被搶注。我國國內(nèi)企業(yè)有在國外被訴侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的,也有完勝而歸的,如:美國萊伏頓公司在美國訴中國通領(lǐng)科技集團(tuán)(原浙江東正電器有限公司)專利侵權(quán)案,經(jīng)過長達(dá)3年的海外訴訟,通領(lǐng)公司勝訴。
    Again, Kong Xiangjun said, the foreign court our brand in overseas are registered cases have also occurred, such as "Wang" has been registered in Germany, "Wuliangye" has been registered in South korea. China's domestic enterprises have the infringement of intellectual property rights in foreign defendants, has succeeded, such as: the United States of America levinton company Protecht group in the United States v. China (formerly Zhejiang Dongzheng Electric Co. Ltd.) patent infringement case, after 3 years of overseas litigation, Tongling company wins v..
    孔祥俊也坦言,由于相關(guān)案件的復(fù)雜性和專業(yè)技術(shù)事實(shí)認(rèn)定困難,法院在審理相關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件時面臨著現(xiàn)實(shí)的挑戰(zhàn)。
    Kong Xiangjun also says frankly, due to the complexity and technical facts related cases are difficult to determine, the court is confronted with the reality of the challenges in the adjudication of cases related to intellectual property.
    一方面,專業(yè)技術(shù)事實(shí)認(rèn)定難。隨著科技發(fā)展,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件涉及科學(xué)技術(shù)事實(shí)越來越尖端、前沿,專業(yè)技術(shù)事實(shí)認(rèn)定困難的案件越來越多,其中涉及生物、化工、醫(yī)藥、電子、通信等高科技領(lǐng)域的案件顯得尤為突出。
    On one hand, professional and technical fact that difficult. With the development of science and technology, intellectual property cases involving science and technology, more and more sophisticated, in fact, professional and technical fact difficult more and more cases, including biological, chemical, pharmaceutical, electronics, communication and other high-tech areas of the case is particularly prominent.
    “由于法院裁判的結(jié)果對當(dāng)事人切身利益影響重大,其中涉及爭奪市場的專利、技術(shù)秘密和商業(yè)標(biāo)識案件顯得尤為突出,所以我們在審理過程中要更加慎重,去注重保護(hù)中外當(dāng)事人雙方的合法權(quán)益?!?BR>    "Because of the influence of court judge the results on the immediate interests of the parties involved in a major, market competition for a patent, technical secrets and commercial mark case is particularly prominent, so we are in the process of trial to be more careful, to pay attention to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign parties."
    另一方面,國內(nèi)有關(guān)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)方面的相關(guān)法律、法規(guī)還有些滯后,需要進(jìn)一步改進(jìn)和完善。要進(jìn)一步發(fā)揮司法保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的主要作用,并研究探索建立知識產(chǎn)權(quán)專門法院來審理大量的相關(guān)案件,他說。
    On the other hand, the protection of intellectual property rights related laws, regulations and some lag, need further improvement and perfection. To further play the main role of judicial protection of intellectual property rights, and to study and explore to establish to hear cases of specialized intellectual property courts, he said.
    “我們將要加大保護(hù)力度,進(jìn)一步完善知識產(chǎn)權(quán)民事、行政和刑事審判溝通和協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制,確保三種審判保護(hù)合力的有效發(fā)揮。要細(xì)化侵犯知識產(chǎn)權(quán)犯罪定罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn),實(shí)現(xiàn)定罪量刑規(guī)范化,”孔祥俊說。
    "We will need to increase the protection, to further improve the IPR civil, administrative and criminal trial communication and coordination mechanism, to ensure that the three trial protection play an effective force. To refine IPR violation criminal conviction standard, realize the conviction and sentencing standardization, "Kong Xiangjun said.
    再有,要進(jìn)一步完善技術(shù)事實(shí)查明機(jī)制,細(xì)化操作程序和規(guī)則。加強(qiáng)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判管理,努力提升知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判質(zhì)量和效率,他說。
    Again, to further improve the technical fact-finding mechanism, detailed operational procedures and rules. Strengthen the trial management of intellectual property rights in intellectual property adjudication, efforts to improve the quality and efficiency, he said.