英語資源頻道為大家整理的china daily 雙語新聞：獨立的第三方在哪里，供大家閱讀參考。
報道說，河南有20家環(huán)評機構(gòu)因弄虛作假等被處理，弄虛作假的辦法包括超范圍承接項目、出具虛假報告、分析防護措施不到位、與不具備資質(zhì)的機構(gòu)合作環(huán)評等。處理結(jié)果是6家取消備案，5家停業(yè)整頓3個月或半年，另有9家通報批評。
Reports say, Henan has 20 EIA agencies are processed by resort to deceit, resort to deceit way including super scope to undertake the project, issued false reports, analysis of the protective measures are not in place, and do not have the cooperation the EIA qualification mechanism etc.. Processing result is 6 to cancel the registration, 5 to rectify the closure of 3 or six months, and another 9 informed criticism.
沒有具體作假案例，因而我們說不好這些處理是溫柔還是嚴厲。不知河南的環(huán)評機構(gòu)有多少，因而也說不好環(huán)評作假的現(xiàn)象普遍不普遍。不過，有一點是可以看到的，這些環(huán)評機構(gòu)都算是“第三方機構(gòu)”，可以讓人知道，對“第三方”也沒有必要莫名崇拜了。
There is no specific fraud case, so we can not say the treatment is soft or hard. How much do the assessment agencies in Henan, and also said that bad EIA false phenomenon generally not common. However, one point can be seen, the EIA agencies are "third parties", can let people know, the "third party" and there is no need to sense the worship.
這些年，每當出現(xiàn)爭議性事項，人們都會呼吁“第三方”出場；每當各持己見，難成共識，人們都會寄希望于“第三方”的公正。確實，如果雙方各持己見而不能相互取信，除了第三方，又能把希望寄托于誰呢？只是，在一個互信已喪失殆盡的社會，人們又如何能夠相信第三方的公正？
These years, whenever a controversial matters, people would call "the third party" appearance; when each sticks to his own view., hard to reach consensus, people in the hope of "third party" justice. Indeed, if the two sides each sticks to his own view. Instead of mutual trust, in addition to the third party, and can put their hopes on who? But, in a mutual trust has been lost in the society, how one might believe that third party fair?
也許，人們會說，只要獲邀出場的第三方經(jīng)過雙方的一致認可，那么就將具有效力。然而，即使如此，又何以知道這不是僅僅達成了形式上的同意，而最后的調(diào)查結(jié)果仍然被視為有所偏向？
Perhaps, people will say, as long as the invited to play third party unanimously approved by both sides, then it will have effect. However, even so, they do know that this is not only a form of consent, and the final results are still considered to be biased?
在傳統(tǒng)的統(tǒng)轄性權(quán)力看來，可信的只有權(quán)力自己，而第三方大有可能是異己力量滋生的土壤，故而不希望給第三方以空間。而且，在統(tǒng)轄性權(quán)力的威勢之下，民眾也未必相信有獨立的第三方存在，更加可能認為第三方不過是權(quán)力的托兒、官員的幫手。
In the view of power control in traditional, credible only power, and the third party is likely to be alien force breeding grounds, so do not want to third parties to space. Also, under the rule of power power, the people would not believe there is an independent third party, the third party but is more likely to think of childcare, official power.
事實上，我們經(jīng)?？梢钥吹降那闆r，確實是獨立品質(zhì)的缺乏。專業(yè)人士要么成了權(quán)力行為的合理化解釋工具，要么成了資本的代言人，要么陷入民粹主義的汪洋。意見光譜相異者甚至已不能同處一片屋頂下，討論、會商的可能性都已消失，哪里還會有共識空間？
In fact, we often can see, really is the lack of independent quality. Professional or a tool to rationalize the power behavior of, or become capital spokesman, either in the ocean of populism. Spectral differences opinions even cannot in the same roof, possibility of discussion, consultation is gone, where there will be a consensus space?
我們看到過民事糾紛中，有雙方各拿出一份“專家意見書”的情形，在這里，專家們就是作為“第三方”而出場的，只是不同的專家在各為其雇主書寫意見罷了。在很多社會論題的討論中，人們置身其間，利害相權(quán)，其實已沒有真正的“第三方”存在。
We have seen in civil disputes, have each come up with a "expert opinion" situation, here, experts known as the "third party" while playing, just different experts in all for the same employer opinion writing. In the discussion of many social issues, people outside the meantime, the pros and cons of the right, but has no real "third party".
今天的社會，與環(huán)評機構(gòu)類似的“第三方”盡管發(fā)育尚未完善，但也并不少見。會計師事務所、司法鑒定所、價格評估中心、仲裁機構(gòu)、評級機構(gòu)等等，作為社會中間組織，具有出具各種意見的資質(zhì)，能夠直接成為權(quán)力作決定時的依據(jù)。像河南處罰的那些環(huán)評機構(gòu)一樣，出具虛假意見的“第三方”難道少見嗎？在這些“第三方”里面，權(quán)力關(guān)系、雇傭關(guān)系、人情關(guān)系都可能左右意見的形成，“獨立”經(jīng)常是一種形式，只不過用以使意見具備合法性，實際立場則可能任意倚偏。
Today's society, similar to the "third party assessment agencies" although development has not been perfect, but it is not rare. The accounting firm, the judicial authentication, price assessment center, arbitration institutions, rating agencies and so on, as a social organization, has issued various views of the qualification, can directly into the power to make a decision on the basis of. As the assessment agencies Henan punishment, issued false opinions "third party" is rare? In the "third party", the formation of power relations, the employment relationship, human relationship may left and right views, "independent" is often a kind of form, but used to make observations with legitimacy, the actual position may be arbitrarily on the partial.
權(quán)力壟斷環(huán)評，環(huán)評會成為尋租手段；環(huán)評開放給“第三方”，則可能變成項目與環(huán)評機構(gòu)合伙欺蒙決策、損害公眾利益的工具。會計師事務所幫助做假賬，司法鑒定所賣人情、價格評估機構(gòu)虛估或壓低價格、仲裁不公、評級混亂等等，都不陌生，以前由權(quán)力管轄時如此，這些機構(gòu)與權(quán)力脫鉤、成為獨立的社會服務行業(yè)時同樣如此。至于律師事務，現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)可以直接宣稱“不求公正，只為當事人辯護”了。
The monopoly of power EIA, EIA will become a rent-seeking means; EIA open to the "third party", it may become projects and EIA agencies partnership deceive decision, damage the public interest tool. Certified public accountants to help cook the books, the judicial authentication do, price assessment agencies virtual estimated or lower prices, the injustice, rating chaos and so on, are not unfamiliar, so before the power of jurisdiction, such as the mechanism and the power decoupling, become an independent social service industry. As for lawyers, can now claim that "do not seek justice directly, only for the client.".
按道理，在企業(yè)與工人之間，政府本身就是第三方；在訴訟雙方之間，法院本身就是第三方。實際上又是怎樣呢？即使受民眾監(jiān)督的第三方，也不過如此；誰出錢為誰辦事的第三方，能夠更好一些嗎？當人們知道應當有“第三方”時，卻發(fā)現(xiàn)沒有真正獨立的“第三方”去給出公正的意見，這實在是一個巨大的社會不幸?；镜恼\信和共識已經(jīng)稀缺，情形就是如此。
In principle, between enterprises and workers, the government itself is the third party in the litigation between the parties; the court itself, is the third party. Actually is what? Even under the people's supervision of the third party, but also so; who pays for who work third party, can better? When people know that there should be a "third party", but found no truly independent "third party" to give an objective opinion, this really is a great social evil. Basic integrity and consensus has been scarce, this is the case.
報道說，河南有20家環(huán)評機構(gòu)因弄虛作假等被處理，弄虛作假的辦法包括超范圍承接項目、出具虛假報告、分析防護措施不到位、與不具備資質(zhì)的機構(gòu)合作環(huán)評等。處理結(jié)果是6家取消備案，5家停業(yè)整頓3個月或半年，另有9家通報批評。
Reports say, Henan has 20 EIA agencies are processed by resort to deceit, resort to deceit way including super scope to undertake the project, issued false reports, analysis of the protective measures are not in place, and do not have the cooperation the EIA qualification mechanism etc.. Processing result is 6 to cancel the registration, 5 to rectify the closure of 3 or six months, and another 9 informed criticism.
沒有具體作假案例，因而我們說不好這些處理是溫柔還是嚴厲。不知河南的環(huán)評機構(gòu)有多少，因而也說不好環(huán)評作假的現(xiàn)象普遍不普遍。不過，有一點是可以看到的，這些環(huán)評機構(gòu)都算是“第三方機構(gòu)”，可以讓人知道，對“第三方”也沒有必要莫名崇拜了。
There is no specific fraud case, so we can not say the treatment is soft or hard. How much do the assessment agencies in Henan, and also said that bad EIA false phenomenon generally not common. However, one point can be seen, the EIA agencies are "third parties", can let people know, the "third party" and there is no need to sense the worship.
這些年，每當出現(xiàn)爭議性事項，人們都會呼吁“第三方”出場；每當各持己見，難成共識，人們都會寄希望于“第三方”的公正。確實，如果雙方各持己見而不能相互取信，除了第三方，又能把希望寄托于誰呢？只是，在一個互信已喪失殆盡的社會，人們又如何能夠相信第三方的公正？
These years, whenever a controversial matters, people would call "the third party" appearance; when each sticks to his own view., hard to reach consensus, people in the hope of "third party" justice. Indeed, if the two sides each sticks to his own view. Instead of mutual trust, in addition to the third party, and can put their hopes on who? But, in a mutual trust has been lost in the society, how one might believe that third party fair?
也許，人們會說，只要獲邀出場的第三方經(jīng)過雙方的一致認可，那么就將具有效力。然而，即使如此，又何以知道這不是僅僅達成了形式上的同意，而最后的調(diào)查結(jié)果仍然被視為有所偏向？
Perhaps, people will say, as long as the invited to play third party unanimously approved by both sides, then it will have effect. However, even so, they do know that this is not only a form of consent, and the final results are still considered to be biased?
在傳統(tǒng)的統(tǒng)轄性權(quán)力看來，可信的只有權(quán)力自己，而第三方大有可能是異己力量滋生的土壤，故而不希望給第三方以空間。而且，在統(tǒng)轄性權(quán)力的威勢之下，民眾也未必相信有獨立的第三方存在，更加可能認為第三方不過是權(quán)力的托兒、官員的幫手。
In the view of power control in traditional, credible only power, and the third party is likely to be alien force breeding grounds, so do not want to third parties to space. Also, under the rule of power power, the people would not believe there is an independent third party, the third party but is more likely to think of childcare, official power.
事實上，我們經(jīng)?？梢钥吹降那闆r，確實是獨立品質(zhì)的缺乏。專業(yè)人士要么成了權(quán)力行為的合理化解釋工具，要么成了資本的代言人，要么陷入民粹主義的汪洋。意見光譜相異者甚至已不能同處一片屋頂下，討論、會商的可能性都已消失，哪里還會有共識空間？
In fact, we often can see, really is the lack of independent quality. Professional or a tool to rationalize the power behavior of, or become capital spokesman, either in the ocean of populism. Spectral differences opinions even cannot in the same roof, possibility of discussion, consultation is gone, where there will be a consensus space?
我們看到過民事糾紛中，有雙方各拿出一份“專家意見書”的情形，在這里，專家們就是作為“第三方”而出場的，只是不同的專家在各為其雇主書寫意見罷了。在很多社會論題的討論中，人們置身其間，利害相權(quán)，其實已沒有真正的“第三方”存在。
We have seen in civil disputes, have each come up with a "expert opinion" situation, here, experts known as the "third party" while playing, just different experts in all for the same employer opinion writing. In the discussion of many social issues, people outside the meantime, the pros and cons of the right, but has no real "third party".
今天的社會，與環(huán)評機構(gòu)類似的“第三方”盡管發(fā)育尚未完善，但也并不少見。會計師事務所、司法鑒定所、價格評估中心、仲裁機構(gòu)、評級機構(gòu)等等，作為社會中間組織，具有出具各種意見的資質(zhì)，能夠直接成為權(quán)力作決定時的依據(jù)。像河南處罰的那些環(huán)評機構(gòu)一樣，出具虛假意見的“第三方”難道少見嗎？在這些“第三方”里面，權(quán)力關(guān)系、雇傭關(guān)系、人情關(guān)系都可能左右意見的形成，“獨立”經(jīng)常是一種形式，只不過用以使意見具備合法性，實際立場則可能任意倚偏。
Today's society, similar to the "third party assessment agencies" although development has not been perfect, but it is not rare. The accounting firm, the judicial authentication, price assessment center, arbitration institutions, rating agencies and so on, as a social organization, has issued various views of the qualification, can directly into the power to make a decision on the basis of. As the assessment agencies Henan punishment, issued false opinions "third party" is rare? In the "third party", the formation of power relations, the employment relationship, human relationship may left and right views, "independent" is often a kind of form, but used to make observations with legitimacy, the actual position may be arbitrarily on the partial.
權(quán)力壟斷環(huán)評，環(huán)評會成為尋租手段；環(huán)評開放給“第三方”，則可能變成項目與環(huán)評機構(gòu)合伙欺蒙決策、損害公眾利益的工具。會計師事務所幫助做假賬，司法鑒定所賣人情、價格評估機構(gòu)虛估或壓低價格、仲裁不公、評級混亂等等，都不陌生，以前由權(quán)力管轄時如此，這些機構(gòu)與權(quán)力脫鉤、成為獨立的社會服務行業(yè)時同樣如此。至于律師事務，現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)可以直接宣稱“不求公正，只為當事人辯護”了。
The monopoly of power EIA, EIA will become a rent-seeking means; EIA open to the "third party", it may become projects and EIA agencies partnership deceive decision, damage the public interest tool. Certified public accountants to help cook the books, the judicial authentication do, price assessment agencies virtual estimated or lower prices, the injustice, rating chaos and so on, are not unfamiliar, so before the power of jurisdiction, such as the mechanism and the power decoupling, become an independent social service industry. As for lawyers, can now claim that "do not seek justice directly, only for the client.".
按道理，在企業(yè)與工人之間，政府本身就是第三方；在訴訟雙方之間，法院本身就是第三方。實際上又是怎樣呢？即使受民眾監(jiān)督的第三方，也不過如此；誰出錢為誰辦事的第三方，能夠更好一些嗎？當人們知道應當有“第三方”時，卻發(fā)現(xiàn)沒有真正獨立的“第三方”去給出公正的意見，這實在是一個巨大的社會不幸?；镜恼\信和共識已經(jīng)稀缺，情形就是如此。
In principle, between enterprises and workers, the government itself is the third party in the litigation between the parties; the court itself, is the third party. Actually is what? Even under the people's supervision of the third party, but also so; who pays for who work third party, can better? When people know that there should be a "third party", but found no truly independent "third party" to give an objective opinion, this really is a great social evil. Basic integrity and consensus has been scarce, this is the case.