49還有一題說由于酒后駕駛導(dǎo)致的事故05年比04年減少了多少百分比，然后官方就說這是由于那時出臺的一個懲罰酒后駕駛的條例還是一檢測方法啥的起了作用。然后如何如何。問削弱。
50.一個地方的人喜歡吃pasta,當(dāng)?shù)刂谱鱬asta開始做低卡路里的pasta,所以當(dāng)?shù)厝瞬粫菀着?我選的是要看當(dāng)?shù)厝顺缘涂防锏氖遣皇潜纫郧俺云胀ǖ亩?BR> 51. 研究所有些醫(yī)生給病人用藥不是因?yàn)樗幒檬苟且驗(yàn)槭艿搅酸t(yī)藥公司的賄賂。問削弱，我選的是藥的profit給的是研究所而不是醫(yī)藥公司。感覺這題做過在哪。
52. 說老師發(fā)現(xiàn)坐在前排的學(xué)生比坐在后排的學(xué)生參加的課堂討論更積極，所以為了提高同學(xué)們的成績應(yīng)該讓學(xué)生按期串座，問削弱。我選的是每周有是寫作課，是不需要參加課堂討論的(感覺這個也做過原題想不起來在哪了)
53. (不完整)衣服在洗完之后纖維發(fā)生變化，新研究出一個e什么什么，能防止纖維發(fā)生這樣的變化，問假設(shè)還是什么想不起來了。
54. (待補(bǔ)充)1350年前的一個東西f 跟z ，因?yàn)槭裁聪Я?，但是后?500的時候又發(fā)現(xiàn)了f ，
。有一個選項(xiàng)說f是z的一種
55. 有個東西在岸邊水域活著，
然后后來有人沒事干去挖(oil)那塊地方，
然后那個東西就少了?？茖W(xué)家又hypothesize了，說人家那里被污染了。問加強(qiáng)：
我選的是，冬天這東西從岸邊向北游的時候，死了一大堆。
就當(dāng)給大家提供個錯誤選項(xiàng)。
還有一個選項(xiàng)是，那油影響ecology
environment.
56. 美國3分之一養(yǎng)貓又養(yǎng)狗，2分之一養(yǎng)狗，選項(xiàng)那個must be true.有人不養(yǎng)貓也不養(yǎng)狗。
57. M公司生產(chǎn)某某東西，但是材料發(fā)現(xiàn)運(yùn)輸費(fèi)和local tax太高了，所以想從N 搬到 P去，
因?yàn)镻距離他們的supplier更近，而且P這個地方工人素質(zhì)高。
問evaluate：
我選的是 whether 運(yùn)輸費(fèi)用在未來幾年不會升高。
58. 有個說有個新的產(chǎn)品XYZ治療哮喘，但是用XYZ的人比用traditional產(chǎn)品的發(fā)病率要高，說是由于醫(yī)生從醫(yī)藥商那里拿了好處，不好好開藥。問削弱：選XYZ一般都開給患病較嚴(yán)重的病人。
59. 說有一種鳥數(shù)量在減少，是因?yàn)檎`食了一種除草劑，問削弱。
我選的是另一種鳥沒有誤食除草劑，數(shù)量也減少了
60.business income 與government corruption的關(guān)系。有研究表示，business income 多的地方，corruption比較少，但是在某些地方(好像有提到具體的地名)，business income 多，corruption也多，explain the discrepancy.有些選項(xiàng)涉及pre-tax, after tax等
61.GWD-TN-7-Q14變體，但是選項(xiàng)全變了，這點(diǎn)大家注意。
Criminologist: Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime. These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently(第一處黑體變成這里). What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime. Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is a claim that has been advanced in support of that conclusion.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against that conclusion.
D. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a prediction made on the basis of that conclusion.
E. The first is a generalization about the likely effect of a policy under consideration in the argument; the second points out a group of exceptional cases to which that generalization does not apply.
Criminologist: Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime. These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently(第一處黑體變成這里). What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime. Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.
50.一個地方的人喜歡吃pasta,當(dāng)?shù)刂谱鱬asta開始做低卡路里的pasta,所以當(dāng)?shù)厝瞬粫菀着?我選的是要看當(dāng)?shù)厝顺缘涂防锏氖遣皇潜纫郧俺云胀ǖ亩?BR> 51. 研究所有些醫(yī)生給病人用藥不是因?yàn)樗幒檬苟且驗(yàn)槭艿搅酸t(yī)藥公司的賄賂。問削弱，我選的是藥的profit給的是研究所而不是醫(yī)藥公司。感覺這題做過在哪。
52. 說老師發(fā)現(xiàn)坐在前排的學(xué)生比坐在后排的學(xué)生參加的課堂討論更積極，所以為了提高同學(xué)們的成績應(yīng)該讓學(xué)生按期串座，問削弱。我選的是每周有是寫作課，是不需要參加課堂討論的(感覺這個也做過原題想不起來在哪了)
53. (不完整)衣服在洗完之后纖維發(fā)生變化，新研究出一個e什么什么，能防止纖維發(fā)生這樣的變化，問假設(shè)還是什么想不起來了。
54. (待補(bǔ)充)1350年前的一個東西f 跟z ，因?yàn)槭裁聪Я?，但是后?500的時候又發(fā)現(xiàn)了f ，
。有一個選項(xiàng)說f是z的一種
55. 有個東西在岸邊水域活著，
然后后來有人沒事干去挖(oil)那塊地方，
然后那個東西就少了?？茖W(xué)家又hypothesize了，說人家那里被污染了。問加強(qiáng)：
我選的是，冬天這東西從岸邊向北游的時候，死了一大堆。
就當(dāng)給大家提供個錯誤選項(xiàng)。
還有一個選項(xiàng)是，那油影響ecology
environment.
56. 美國3分之一養(yǎng)貓又養(yǎng)狗，2分之一養(yǎng)狗，選項(xiàng)那個must be true.有人不養(yǎng)貓也不養(yǎng)狗。
57. M公司生產(chǎn)某某東西，但是材料發(fā)現(xiàn)運(yùn)輸費(fèi)和local tax太高了，所以想從N 搬到 P去，
因?yàn)镻距離他們的supplier更近，而且P這個地方工人素質(zhì)高。
問evaluate：
我選的是 whether 運(yùn)輸費(fèi)用在未來幾年不會升高。
58. 有個說有個新的產(chǎn)品XYZ治療哮喘，但是用XYZ的人比用traditional產(chǎn)品的發(fā)病率要高，說是由于醫(yī)生從醫(yī)藥商那里拿了好處，不好好開藥。問削弱：選XYZ一般都開給患病較嚴(yán)重的病人。
59. 說有一種鳥數(shù)量在減少，是因?yàn)檎`食了一種除草劑，問削弱。
我選的是另一種鳥沒有誤食除草劑，數(shù)量也減少了
60.business income 與government corruption的關(guān)系。有研究表示，business income 多的地方，corruption比較少，但是在某些地方(好像有提到具體的地名)，business income 多，corruption也多，explain the discrepancy.有些選項(xiàng)涉及pre-tax, after tax等
61.GWD-TN-7-Q14變體，但是選項(xiàng)全變了，這點(diǎn)大家注意。
Criminologist: Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime. These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently(第一處黑體變成這里). What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime. Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is a claim that has been advanced in support of that conclusion.
B. The first is a conclusion that the argument as a whole seeks to refute; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against that conclusion.
D. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a prediction made on the basis of that conclusion.
E. The first is a generalization about the likely effect of a policy under consideration in the argument; the second points out a group of exceptional cases to which that generalization does not apply.
Criminologist: Some legislators advocate mandating a sentence of life in prison for anyone who, having twice served sentences for serious crimes, is subsequently convicted of a third serious crime. These legislators argue that such a policy would reduce crime dramatically, since it would take people with a proven tendency to commit crimes off the streets permanently(第一處黑體變成這里). What this reasoning overlooks, however, is that people old enough to have served two prison sentences for serious crimes rarely commit more than one subsequent crime. Filling our prisons with such individuals would have exactly the opposite of the desired effect, since it would limit our ability to incarcerate younger criminals, who commit a far greater proportion of serious crimes.