《達(dá)爾文的黑盒子》
邁克爾·貝希 1996年
上榜理由：掀起信奉正統(tǒng)派基督教的人對(duì)科學(xué)的攻擊。
這本書（通過(guò)假擬科學(xué)和非真理）從而為這樣一種想法推波助瀾，既進(jìn)化論是虛假的，《創(chuàng)世記》的字面解釋僅僅是地球被創(chuàng)造的辦法。盡管受到了科學(xué)界的駁斥，但許多信奉正統(tǒng)派基督教的人還是把它看作*進(jìn)化論為真的有力證據(jù)“來(lái)源”。這本書并沒(méi)有在貝希信誓旦旦的宣示之下得到同行的評(píng)議，科學(xué)界仍對(duì)此極力反對(duì)。
Darwin's Black Box
Michael Behe, 1996
On the list because: It fuels fundamentalist attacks on Science
This book has helped to fuel （through pseudo-science and untruths） the idea that evolution is false and that a literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis is the only possible manner in which the earth was created. Despite much refutation from the Scientific community, many fundamentalists still use this as a “source” for proof that evolution is not true. The book itself was not peer reviewed as Behe claimed under oath, and the Science community has overwhelming rejected it.
邁克爾·貝希 1996年
上榜理由：掀起信奉正統(tǒng)派基督教的人對(duì)科學(xué)的攻擊。
這本書（通過(guò)假擬科學(xué)和非真理）從而為這樣一種想法推波助瀾，既進(jìn)化論是虛假的，《創(chuàng)世記》的字面解釋僅僅是地球被創(chuàng)造的辦法。盡管受到了科學(xué)界的駁斥，但許多信奉正統(tǒng)派基督教的人還是把它看作*進(jìn)化論為真的有力證據(jù)“來(lái)源”。這本書并沒(méi)有在貝希信誓旦旦的宣示之下得到同行的評(píng)議，科學(xué)界仍對(duì)此極力反對(duì)。
Darwin's Black Box
Michael Behe, 1996
On the list because: It fuels fundamentalist attacks on Science
This book has helped to fuel （through pseudo-science and untruths） the idea that evolution is false and that a literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis is the only possible manner in which the earth was created. Despite much refutation from the Scientific community, many fundamentalists still use this as a “source” for proof that evolution is not true. The book itself was not peer reviewed as Behe claimed under oath, and the Science community has overwhelming rejected it.