its major advantage, says dr. zeleznikow, is that people are less likely to litigate once they know the likely court outcome. “l(fā)et's say the program predicts that each partner will get $250 000 from a property settlement. if they go to court the cost to each could be $ 50 000 to litigate. this is a powerful incentive to negotiate instead."
the la trobe research team has attracted international attention for its devleopment of systems which can reason with both statutes (rules) and precedents (cases). the systems are being used in fields which include legal aid and credit law.
1. in the passage means “previous cases”.分析與解答
a. statutes
b. precedents
c. clients
d. incentives
2. what is not taken into consideration during a divorce case? 分析與解答
a. the family house.
b. the bank deposit.
c. the time duration of the marriage.
d. children's education.
3. split up can do all but . 分析與解答
a. to persuade the judge that its decision is the right one
b. to recall past divorce cases when necessary
c. to seek and then process the information it need
d. to do complex calculation and reasoning
4. the second “it" in para. 3 refers to . 分析與解答
a. the software
b. a previous case
c. the way the property would be divided
d. a particular divorce
5. what is not implied in the passage? 分析與解答
a. family law court judges judge according to both rules and precedents.
b. if the parties in a divorce know they will not profit from a lawsuit, they would settle outside the court.
c. there is clear-cut law on how to divide property between parties in a divorce.
d. split up will help reduce the number of divorce cases presented in court.
the la trobe research team has attracted international attention for its devleopment of systems which can reason with both statutes (rules) and precedents (cases). the systems are being used in fields which include legal aid and credit law.
1. in the passage means “previous cases”.分析與解答
a. statutes
b. precedents
c. clients
d. incentives
2. what is not taken into consideration during a divorce case? 分析與解答
a. the family house.
b. the bank deposit.
c. the time duration of the marriage.
d. children's education.
3. split up can do all but . 分析與解答
a. to persuade the judge that its decision is the right one
b. to recall past divorce cases when necessary
c. to seek and then process the information it need
d. to do complex calculation and reasoning
4. the second “it" in para. 3 refers to . 分析與解答
a. the software
b. a previous case
c. the way the property would be divided
d. a particular divorce
5. what is not implied in the passage? 分析與解答
a. family law court judges judge according to both rules and precedents.
b. if the parties in a divorce know they will not profit from a lawsuit, they would settle outside the court.
c. there is clear-cut law on how to divide property between parties in a divorce.
d. split up will help reduce the number of divorce cases presented in court.