Of Beauty
by Francis Bacon
VIRTUE is like a rich stone, best plain set; and surely virtue is best, in a body that is comely, though not of delicate features; and that hath rather dignity of presence, than beauty of aspect. Neither is it almost seen, that very beautiful persons are otherwise of great virtue; as if nature were rather busy, not to err, than in labor to produce excellency. And therefore they prove accomplished, but not of great spirit; and study rather behavior, than virtue. But this holds not always: for Augustus Caesar, Titus Vespasianus, Philip le Belle of France, Edward the Fourth of England, Alcibiades of Athens, Ismael the Sophy of Persia, were all high and great spirits; and yet the most beautiful men of their times. In beauty, that of favor, is more than that of color; and that of decent and gracious motion, more than that of favor. That is the best part of beauty, which a picture cannot express; no, nor the first sight of the life. There is no excellent beauty, that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. A man cannot tell whether Apelles, or Albert Durer, were the more trifler; whereof the one, would make a personage by geometrical proportions; the other, by taking the best parts out of divers faces, to make one excellent. Such personages, I think, would please nobody, but the painter that made them. Not but I think a painter may make a better face than ever was; but he must do it by a kind of felicity (as a musician that maketh an excellent air in music), and not by rule. A man shall see faces, that if you examine them part by part, you shall find never a good; and yet altogether do well. If it be true that the principal part of beauty is in decent motion, certainly it is no marvel, though persons in years seem many times more amiable; pulchrorum autumnus pulcher; for no youth can be comely but by pardon, and considering the youth, as to make up the comeliness. Beauty is as summer fruits,) which are easy to corrupt, and cannot last; and for the most part it makes a dissolute youth, and an age a little out of countenance; but yet certainly again, if it light well, it maketh virtue shine, and vices blush.
德行猶如寶石，樸素最美；其于人也，則有德者但須形體悅目，不必面貌俊秀，與其貌美，不若氣度恢宏。人不盡知：絕色無大德也；一如自然勞碌終日，但求無過，而無力制成上品。因此美男子有才而無壯志，重行而不重德。但亦不盡然。羅馬大帝奧古斯特與泰特思，法王菲力浦，英王愛德華四世，古雅典之亞西拜提斯，波斯之伊斯邁帝，皆有宏圖壯志而又為當(dāng)時最美之人也。美不在顏色艷麗而在面目端正，又不盡在面目端正而在舉止文雅合度。美之極致，非圖畫所能表，乍見所能識。舉凡最美之人，其部分比例，必有異于常人之處。阿貝爾與杜勒皆畫家也，其畫人像也，一則按照幾何學(xué)之比例，一則集眾臉形之長于一身，二者誰更不智，實(shí)難斷言，竊以為此等畫像除畫家本人外，恐無人喜愛也。余不否認(rèn)畫像之美可以超絕塵寰，但此美必為神筆，而非可依規(guī)矩得之者，樂師之譜成名曲亦莫不皆然。人面如逐部細(xì)察，往往一無是處，觀其整體則光彩奪目。美之要素既在于舉止，則年長美過年少亦無足怪。古人云：“美者秋日亦美?！蹦晟俣烂视蓪捈?，蓋鑒其年事之少，而補(bǔ)其形體之不足也。美者猶如夏日蔬果，易腐難存；要之，年少而美者常無行，年長而美者不免面有慚色。雖然，但須托體得人，則德行因美而益彰，惡行見美而愈愧。（王佐良 譯）
by Francis Bacon
VIRTUE is like a rich stone, best plain set; and surely virtue is best, in a body that is comely, though not of delicate features; and that hath rather dignity of presence, than beauty of aspect. Neither is it almost seen, that very beautiful persons are otherwise of great virtue; as if nature were rather busy, not to err, than in labor to produce excellency. And therefore they prove accomplished, but not of great spirit; and study rather behavior, than virtue. But this holds not always: for Augustus Caesar, Titus Vespasianus, Philip le Belle of France, Edward the Fourth of England, Alcibiades of Athens, Ismael the Sophy of Persia, were all high and great spirits; and yet the most beautiful men of their times. In beauty, that of favor, is more than that of color; and that of decent and gracious motion, more than that of favor. That is the best part of beauty, which a picture cannot express; no, nor the first sight of the life. There is no excellent beauty, that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. A man cannot tell whether Apelles, or Albert Durer, were the more trifler; whereof the one, would make a personage by geometrical proportions; the other, by taking the best parts out of divers faces, to make one excellent. Such personages, I think, would please nobody, but the painter that made them. Not but I think a painter may make a better face than ever was; but he must do it by a kind of felicity (as a musician that maketh an excellent air in music), and not by rule. A man shall see faces, that if you examine them part by part, you shall find never a good; and yet altogether do well. If it be true that the principal part of beauty is in decent motion, certainly it is no marvel, though persons in years seem many times more amiable; pulchrorum autumnus pulcher; for no youth can be comely but by pardon, and considering the youth, as to make up the comeliness. Beauty is as summer fruits,) which are easy to corrupt, and cannot last; and for the most part it makes a dissolute youth, and an age a little out of countenance; but yet certainly again, if it light well, it maketh virtue shine, and vices blush.
德行猶如寶石，樸素最美；其于人也，則有德者但須形體悅目，不必面貌俊秀，與其貌美，不若氣度恢宏。人不盡知：絕色無大德也；一如自然勞碌終日，但求無過，而無力制成上品。因此美男子有才而無壯志，重行而不重德。但亦不盡然。羅馬大帝奧古斯特與泰特思，法王菲力浦，英王愛德華四世，古雅典之亞西拜提斯，波斯之伊斯邁帝，皆有宏圖壯志而又為當(dāng)時最美之人也。美不在顏色艷麗而在面目端正，又不盡在面目端正而在舉止文雅合度。美之極致，非圖畫所能表，乍見所能識。舉凡最美之人，其部分比例，必有異于常人之處。阿貝爾與杜勒皆畫家也，其畫人像也，一則按照幾何學(xué)之比例，一則集眾臉形之長于一身，二者誰更不智，實(shí)難斷言，竊以為此等畫像除畫家本人外，恐無人喜愛也。余不否認(rèn)畫像之美可以超絕塵寰，但此美必為神筆，而非可依規(guī)矩得之者，樂師之譜成名曲亦莫不皆然。人面如逐部細(xì)察，往往一無是處，觀其整體則光彩奪目。美之要素既在于舉止，則年長美過年少亦無足怪。古人云：“美者秋日亦美?！蹦晟俣烂视蓪捈?，蓋鑒其年事之少，而補(bǔ)其形體之不足也。美者猶如夏日蔬果，易腐難存；要之，年少而美者常無行，年長而美者不免面有慚色。雖然，但須托體得人，則德行因美而益彰，惡行見美而愈愧。（王佐良 譯）