GMAT新黃金80題及作文范文(十六)(3)

字號(hào):

129. “Instead of relying on the advice of outside experts, organizations should place greater value on the advice that can come only from their own highly experienced employees.”
    Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
    “與其依賴(lài)外部專(zhuān)家的建議,一個(gè)組織更應(yīng)該看重那些只能來(lái)自它的內(nèi)部的資深員工的建議?!?BR>    1. 公司內(nèi)部員工的意見(jiàn)非常重要:首先,公司內(nèi)部員工更有動(dòng)力關(guān)心公司的情況,從而更加主動(dòng)積極地思考。第二,公司內(nèi)部員工更加了解公司的情況,從而可能找到問(wèn)題所在。比如說(shuō)生產(chǎn)力下降可能有很多原因,比如技術(shù)、比如員工morale,比如組織的管理。這些由外部的專(zhuān)家來(lái)研究可能沒(méi)有那么直接。
    2. 但是,外部的專(zhuān)家也有不能忽視的優(yōu)勢(shì)。首先,更加專(zhuān)業(yè),可以提供professional advice。第二,外部的人可以更加客觀地衡量一個(gè)企業(yè)的經(jīng)營(yíng)情況operating condition。from a more objective sight. 第三,外部的人可以看到全面的公司,從而給出綜合的意見(jiàn)integrated opinion about the whole company.
    3. 需要結(jié)合在一起。比如外部的人員充分地聽(tīng)取內(nèi)部的意見(jiàn),作為判斷的根據(jù)base their judgment on information from the experienced employees.
    1. Admittedly, the insiders are more familiar with the detailed routine of the of the company. They are experts of their own field and they are in charge of the daily activities of the company. All the above-mentioned factors contribute to their competence to make decisions for the company.
    2. However, the outsiders also have their advantages. They can judge the performance of a company from an objective angle.
    3. Moreover, they can overlook a company, thus providing a perspective to analyze the overall situation.
    View1: advices from inner highly experienced employees are good resources to improve the performance of the company.
    Evidence: they are familiar with the circumstance therefore can develop exact perception of the problems.
    View2: However outside experts have their own advantages in dealing with organizational problems.
    But outside experts add a wide spectrum of judgment, outlook, and state-of-the-art experience to problems confronting organizations.
    Conclusion: they are not mutually exclusive alternatives, which one to adopt depend on the specific situations.