132. “Governments should not be responsible for regulating businesses and other organizations. Instead, society would benefit if the organizations themselves assumed responsibility for establishing and enforcing their own standards and regulations.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
“政府不應(yīng)該對(duì)規(guī)范企業(yè)和其他組織負(fù)責(zé)。相反，如果組織自身承擔(dān)建立和執(zhí)行他們自己的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和規(guī)范的責(zé)任，那么社會(huì)會(huì)得利?！?BR> 1. Admittedly, the goveronment should not regulate the business or other organizations too much. Too much supervision will harm the development of the business or an organization.
2. Let the business alone to regulate itself will also cause problems. The ultimate goal of the business is to gain benefit, therefore all the activities will serve this pivotal goal even at the expense of the social benefit.
3. The ideal combination can be the midst.
1. too much interference from the government would undoubtedly impede the development of businesses and organizations. 1, 政府干涉過多可能或扼殺企業(yè)的積極性positivity. 顯然如果沒有自主決定the power of independently making decisions, 那么eventually, lead to the less active economy. 2, 政府過度的exorbitant干涉可能會(huì)打亂市場發(fā)展的自然規(guī)律disturb the natural order of the market. 比如regulation on the type of product 可能市場上的excessive demand or supply.
2. 但是也不是說政府should assume no necessary supervision over the business. 首先, 畢竟,企業(yè)的一切行為都是為了利益化. 缺乏管理,很可能產(chǎn)生很多negative results.政府有義務(wù)確保keep the national market in healthy condition. 如果缺乏suitable regulation, 有可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)惡性的競爭inordinate competition. 又比如Enron cheat on the financial condition. 第二, 政府有時(shí)要幫助企業(yè)度過recession.依靠企業(yè)自身的力量, 可能不能overcome the huge destroy of the recession.
3. 要有適當(dāng)?shù)膔egulation, 同時(shí)adequate freedom. 才能健康地發(fā)展.
View1: if organizations are allowed to establish their own regulations, the enforcement of regulations will be enhanced and the governmental burden of organizations will be released.
View2: however, the lack of authoritative and uniform regulations will ultimately do harm to both organizations and entire society.
Evidence: disturb of market order, monopoly, unfair competition.
To society: Unqualified products, high prices, environmental pollution, waste of resources
Do harm to international trade because the lack of uniform standards and the assurance of credit.
A12. “Because technology has increased the speed of communication, people are less able to communicate, except on the most superficial level.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
1. 技術(shù)的進(jìn)步，各種各樣通訊工具使得原本不能交流的人可以交流。不同種族的不同國家的人利用各種通訊工具把曾經(jīng)不可能的跨地域交流變成了可能。而各種文化的碰撞使得不同文化可以交融從而使得人們可以更深層次的思考問題也就可以更好地交流。
2. 同時(shí)技術(shù)進(jìn)步使得人們交流可以更有效率并且隨時(shí)隨地。過去是否可以交流還有交流的時(shí)間都受到限制，怎么可能比現(xiàn)在更為深入
3. 誠然，由于msn，OICQ等聊天工具的出現(xiàn)人們的交流往往比較帶有隨意性停留在表層。但是這并不是交流的全部也不能因此就說人們的交流能力只是在表層上有所提高。
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
“政府不應(yīng)該對(duì)規(guī)范企業(yè)和其他組織負(fù)責(zé)。相反，如果組織自身承擔(dān)建立和執(zhí)行他們自己的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和規(guī)范的責(zé)任，那么社會(huì)會(huì)得利?！?BR> 1. Admittedly, the goveronment should not regulate the business or other organizations too much. Too much supervision will harm the development of the business or an organization.
2. Let the business alone to regulate itself will also cause problems. The ultimate goal of the business is to gain benefit, therefore all the activities will serve this pivotal goal even at the expense of the social benefit.
3. The ideal combination can be the midst.
1. too much interference from the government would undoubtedly impede the development of businesses and organizations. 1, 政府干涉過多可能或扼殺企業(yè)的積極性positivity. 顯然如果沒有自主決定the power of independently making decisions, 那么eventually, lead to the less active economy. 2, 政府過度的exorbitant干涉可能會(huì)打亂市場發(fā)展的自然規(guī)律disturb the natural order of the market. 比如regulation on the type of product 可能市場上的excessive demand or supply.
2. 但是也不是說政府should assume no necessary supervision over the business. 首先, 畢竟,企業(yè)的一切行為都是為了利益化. 缺乏管理,很可能產(chǎn)生很多negative results.政府有義務(wù)確保keep the national market in healthy condition. 如果缺乏suitable regulation, 有可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)惡性的競爭inordinate competition. 又比如Enron cheat on the financial condition. 第二, 政府有時(shí)要幫助企業(yè)度過recession.依靠企業(yè)自身的力量, 可能不能overcome the huge destroy of the recession.
3. 要有適當(dāng)?shù)膔egulation, 同時(shí)adequate freedom. 才能健康地發(fā)展.
View1: if organizations are allowed to establish their own regulations, the enforcement of regulations will be enhanced and the governmental burden of organizations will be released.
View2: however, the lack of authoritative and uniform regulations will ultimately do harm to both organizations and entire society.
Evidence: disturb of market order, monopoly, unfair competition.
To society: Unqualified products, high prices, environmental pollution, waste of resources
Do harm to international trade because the lack of uniform standards and the assurance of credit.
A12. “Because technology has increased the speed of communication, people are less able to communicate, except on the most superficial level.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
1. 技術(shù)的進(jìn)步，各種各樣通訊工具使得原本不能交流的人可以交流。不同種族的不同國家的人利用各種通訊工具把曾經(jīng)不可能的跨地域交流變成了可能。而各種文化的碰撞使得不同文化可以交融從而使得人們可以更深層次的思考問題也就可以更好地交流。
2. 同時(shí)技術(shù)進(jìn)步使得人們交流可以更有效率并且隨時(shí)隨地。過去是否可以交流還有交流的時(shí)間都受到限制，怎么可能比現(xiàn)在更為深入
3. 誠然，由于msn，OICQ等聊天工具的出現(xiàn)人們的交流往往比較帶有隨意性停留在表層。但是這并不是交流的全部也不能因此就說人們的交流能力只是在表層上有所提高。