120. The following appeared in a corporate planning memorandum for a company that develops amusement parks.
“Because travel from our country to foreign countries has increased dramatically in recent years, our next project should be a World Tour theme park with replicas of famous foreign buildings, rides that have international themes, and refreshment stands serving only foods from the country represented by the nearest ride. The best location would be near our capital city, which has large percentages of international residents and of children under the age of 16. Given the advantages of this site and the growing interest in foreign countries, the World Tour theme park should be as successful as our Space Travel theme park, where attendance has increased tenfold over the past decade.”
修建休閑公園的公司的董事會計劃備忘錄：
因為我國到其他國家的交通在近幾年顯著增加，我們的下一個目標應該是世界之旅主題公園，公園有各國建筑的復制品，有國際主題的旅行（ride？），點心攤位只提供離得最近的那個旅行方式所代表的國家的食物。的地點是靠近首都附近，那里有大量的國際居民和16歲以下的小孩。有了這個便利的地點和對國外興趣的增長，世界交通主題公園將會和我們的參觀者增長10倍的太空旅行主題公園一樣成功。
1. Increasing travel from the country the mentioned comany belongs to to foreign countries does not necessarily mean there is also a increasing interest in the amusment parks with a world tour theme.
2. Therefore, the proposal that the amusement park should be bulit in the capital city is also groundless.
3. Even if there is an increasing interest in the parks with a theme of world tour, it is not necessary to go to the extreme such us making the refreshment stands serve only foods from the country represented by the nearest ride.
4. What is more, the company’s plan is based on a false analogy that the World tour theme park should be as successful as the Space travel theme park.
1. Increase in travelling abroad doesn’t guarantee an increase in the interest to go the World Tour theme park.
2. Gratuitous assumption: No reliable evidence can support the idea that the capital city is the best location for an amusement park.
3. False analogy.
“Because travel from our country to foreign countries has increased dramatically in recent years, our next project should be a World Tour theme park with replicas of famous foreign buildings, rides that have international themes, and refreshment stands serving only foods from the country represented by the nearest ride. The best location would be near our capital city, which has large percentages of international residents and of children under the age of 16. Given the advantages of this site and the growing interest in foreign countries, the World Tour theme park should be as successful as our Space Travel theme park, where attendance has increased tenfold over the past decade.”
修建休閑公園的公司的董事會計劃備忘錄：
因為我國到其他國家的交通在近幾年顯著增加，我們的下一個目標應該是世界之旅主題公園，公園有各國建筑的復制品，有國際主題的旅行（ride？），點心攤位只提供離得最近的那個旅行方式所代表的國家的食物。的地點是靠近首都附近，那里有大量的國際居民和16歲以下的小孩。有了這個便利的地點和對國外興趣的增長，世界交通主題公園將會和我們的參觀者增長10倍的太空旅行主題公園一樣成功。
1. Increasing travel from the country the mentioned comany belongs to to foreign countries does not necessarily mean there is also a increasing interest in the amusment parks with a world tour theme.
2. Therefore, the proposal that the amusement park should be bulit in the capital city is also groundless.
3. Even if there is an increasing interest in the parks with a theme of world tour, it is not necessary to go to the extreme such us making the refreshment stands serve only foods from the country represented by the nearest ride.
4. What is more, the company’s plan is based on a false analogy that the World tour theme park should be as successful as the Space travel theme park.
1. Increase in travelling abroad doesn’t guarantee an increase in the interest to go the World Tour theme park.
2. Gratuitous assumption: No reliable evidence can support the idea that the capital city is the best location for an amusement park.
3. False analogy.