Chairman of Norwegian Nobel Committee： I call one of the Nobel laureats， Mohamed Elbarade， to give the Noble lecture for 2005.
Mohamed Elbarade： Your Majesties， Your Royal Highness， Honourable Members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee， Excellencies， Ladies and Gentlemen. The International Atomic Energy Agency and I are humbled， proud， delighted and above all strengthened in our resolve by this most worthy of honours.
My sister-in-law works for a group that supports orphanages in Cairo. She and her colleagues take care of children left behind by circumstances beyond their control. They feed these children， clothe them and teach them to read.
At the International Atomic Energy Agency， my colleagues and I work to keep nuclear materials out of the reach of extremist groups. We inspect nuclear facilities all over the world， to be sure that peaceful nuclear activities are not being used as a cloak for weapons programmes.
My sister-in-law and I are working towards the same goal， through different paths： the security of the human family.
But why has this security so far eluded us？
I believe it is because our security strategies have not yet caught up with the risks we are facing. The globalization that has swept away the barriers to the movement of goods， ideas and people has also swept with it barriers that confined and localized security threats.
A recent United Nations High-Level Panel identified five categories of threats that we face：
1. Poverty， Infectious Disease， and Environmental Degradation；2. Armed Conflict ？both within and among states；3. Organized Crime；4. Terrorism； and 5. Weapons of Mass Destruction. These are all 'threats without borders' ？where traditional notions of national security have become obsolete. We cannot respond to these threats by building more walls， developing bigger weapons， or dispatching more troops. Quite to the contrary. By their very nature， these security threats require primarily multinational cooperation.
But what is more important is that these are not separate or distinct threats. When we scratch the surface， we find them closely connected and interrelated.
We are 1，000 people here today in this august hall. Imagine for a moment that we represent the world's population. These 200 people on my left would be the wealthy of the world， who consume 80 per cent of the available resources. And these 400 people on my right would be living on an income of less than $2 per day.
This underprivileged group of people on my right is no less intelligent or less worthy than their fellow human beings on the other side of the aisle. They were simply born into this fate.
In the real world， this imbalance in living conditions inevitably leads to inequality of opportunity， and in many cases loss of hope. And what is worse， all too often the plight of the poor is compounded by and results in human rights abuses， a lack of good governance， and a deep sense of injustice. This combination naturally creates a most fertile breeding ground for civil wars， organized crime， and extremism in its different forms.
Mohamed Elbarade： Your Majesties， Your Royal Highness， Honourable Members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee， Excellencies， Ladies and Gentlemen. The International Atomic Energy Agency and I are humbled， proud， delighted and above all strengthened in our resolve by this most worthy of honours.
My sister-in-law works for a group that supports orphanages in Cairo. She and her colleagues take care of children left behind by circumstances beyond their control. They feed these children， clothe them and teach them to read.
At the International Atomic Energy Agency， my colleagues and I work to keep nuclear materials out of the reach of extremist groups. We inspect nuclear facilities all over the world， to be sure that peaceful nuclear activities are not being used as a cloak for weapons programmes.
My sister-in-law and I are working towards the same goal， through different paths： the security of the human family.
But why has this security so far eluded us？
I believe it is because our security strategies have not yet caught up with the risks we are facing. The globalization that has swept away the barriers to the movement of goods， ideas and people has also swept with it barriers that confined and localized security threats.
A recent United Nations High-Level Panel identified five categories of threats that we face：
1. Poverty， Infectious Disease， and Environmental Degradation；2. Armed Conflict ？both within and among states；3. Organized Crime；4. Terrorism； and 5. Weapons of Mass Destruction. These are all 'threats without borders' ？where traditional notions of national security have become obsolete. We cannot respond to these threats by building more walls， developing bigger weapons， or dispatching more troops. Quite to the contrary. By their very nature， these security threats require primarily multinational cooperation.
But what is more important is that these are not separate or distinct threats. When we scratch the surface， we find them closely connected and interrelated.
We are 1，000 people here today in this august hall. Imagine for a moment that we represent the world's population. These 200 people on my left would be the wealthy of the world， who consume 80 per cent of the available resources. And these 400 people on my right would be living on an income of less than $2 per day.
This underprivileged group of people on my right is no less intelligent or less worthy than their fellow human beings on the other side of the aisle. They were simply born into this fate.
In the real world， this imbalance in living conditions inevitably leads to inequality of opportunity， and in many cases loss of hope. And what is worse， all too often the plight of the poor is compounded by and results in human rights abuses， a lack of good governance， and a deep sense of injustice. This combination naturally creates a most fertile breeding ground for civil wars， organized crime， and extremism in its different forms.