Read and think about the following statement：
Fiction（such as novels and short stories） can teach us more about life than textbooks can.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement？ Use specific reasons to support your answer.
試題分析
一 條件： 一句話表達(dá)一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)/該觀點(diǎn)有關(guān)虛構(gòu)作品與教科書對(duì)我們的教益/教益是在生活方面/具體觀點(diǎn)是：虛構(gòu)作品比教科書的作用大/虛構(gòu)作品指小說(shuō)和短片故十類
二 要求： 對(duì)此觀點(diǎn)是否同意,用具體的理由支持自己的觀點(diǎn)
三 寫作分析： 主義題目中的比較是有關(guān)生活,應(yīng)就生活而言,談兩種書籍的作用與影響. 就生活而言,題中的觀點(diǎn)是正確的,因?yàn)樾≌f(shuō)與故市的內(nèi)容與生活的關(guān)系很密切,沒(méi)有生活就沒(méi)有創(chuàng)作.這條思路可以連續(xù)下去,找出幾條理由,只要能說(shuō)明問(wèn)題即可.
I agree with this statement because the comparison between fiction and textbooks concerns what they can teach us about life, not about something academic and abstract. It is an obvious fact that fiction cantains much more life than textbook. In a novel for instance, there are different characters portrayed in some definite settings of time and place. When we read the novel, we follow the characters into a fictious world in which there is everything that people can find in the real world. The result is that we can experience all that the characters do and we enjoy the advantage of having an omniscent view, able to see many things that we cannot in the real world.
In contrast, most textbooks teach us knowledge in various special fields, knowledge that is abstract and academic. Some textbooks do teach us some truths about life, but they are only guidelines that we may not able to appreciate. Like fiction, a few textbooks of language and literature can teach us something about life, but they contain only some chapters or exerpts and thus are short and incomplete. In short, textbooks teach us far less about life than fictious works because of their limitations in both content and quantity.
The other reason why fiction can teach us more about life is that we read much more fiction than textbooks. Because fictious works are usually intresting, wee read them whenever we have time to spare or get bored with our studies； and we often get so absorbed that we do not want to stop until the end. In contrast, textbooks are normally dull and we get tired of reading easily. As a result, we ead much more of fiction and learn much more rom it about life than from textbooks.
范文寫法說(shuō)明
文章采用簡(jiǎn)單的演繹法,首先表明觀點(diǎn),然后談了三點(diǎn)理由,以數(shù)量與內(nèi)容兩條線貫穿全文.
第一段： 表明觀點(diǎn),細(xì)文學(xué)作品的內(nèi)容
第二段： 教科書中的內(nèi)容
第三段： 從閱讀性與趣味性兩方面談文學(xué)作品的影響.
Fiction（such as novels and short stories） can teach us more about life than textbooks can.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement？ Use specific reasons to support your answer.
試題分析
一 條件： 一句話表達(dá)一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)/該觀點(diǎn)有關(guān)虛構(gòu)作品與教科書對(duì)我們的教益/教益是在生活方面/具體觀點(diǎn)是：虛構(gòu)作品比教科書的作用大/虛構(gòu)作品指小說(shuō)和短片故十類
二 要求： 對(duì)此觀點(diǎn)是否同意,用具體的理由支持自己的觀點(diǎn)
三 寫作分析： 主義題目中的比較是有關(guān)生活,應(yīng)就生活而言,談兩種書籍的作用與影響. 就生活而言,題中的觀點(diǎn)是正確的,因?yàn)樾≌f(shuō)與故市的內(nèi)容與生活的關(guān)系很密切,沒(méi)有生活就沒(méi)有創(chuàng)作.這條思路可以連續(xù)下去,找出幾條理由,只要能說(shuō)明問(wèn)題即可.
I agree with this statement because the comparison between fiction and textbooks concerns what they can teach us about life, not about something academic and abstract. It is an obvious fact that fiction cantains much more life than textbook. In a novel for instance, there are different characters portrayed in some definite settings of time and place. When we read the novel, we follow the characters into a fictious world in which there is everything that people can find in the real world. The result is that we can experience all that the characters do and we enjoy the advantage of having an omniscent view, able to see many things that we cannot in the real world.
In contrast, most textbooks teach us knowledge in various special fields, knowledge that is abstract and academic. Some textbooks do teach us some truths about life, but they are only guidelines that we may not able to appreciate. Like fiction, a few textbooks of language and literature can teach us something about life, but they contain only some chapters or exerpts and thus are short and incomplete. In short, textbooks teach us far less about life than fictious works because of their limitations in both content and quantity.
The other reason why fiction can teach us more about life is that we read much more fiction than textbooks. Because fictious works are usually intresting, wee read them whenever we have time to spare or get bored with our studies； and we often get so absorbed that we do not want to stop until the end. In contrast, textbooks are normally dull and we get tired of reading easily. As a result, we ead much more of fiction and learn much more rom it about life than from textbooks.
范文寫法說(shuō)明
文章采用簡(jiǎn)單的演繹法,首先表明觀點(diǎn),然后談了三點(diǎn)理由,以數(shù)量與內(nèi)容兩條線貫穿全文.
第一段： 表明觀點(diǎn),細(xì)文學(xué)作品的內(nèi)容
第二段： 教科書中的內(nèi)容
第三段： 從閱讀性與趣味性兩方面談文學(xué)作品的影響.