先來看看4月5日雅思作文的題目：
A long-distance flight consumes the fuel as much as a car consumes in several years time, and causes the same amount of pollution as cars. So some people think we should abandon the non-essential fights (such as for tourism), and it is more efficient than restricting the car use. Give your opinion about it.
再來看看我4月1號發(fā)表的預測里面三級預測的例題：
Long-distance flights are causing serious environmental problems today. Some people say that we should ban air travel totally in order to save the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
可以看到兩個題目非常相像，原因在于這次考的題目事實上是2006年3月25日考過的老題，我本來預測這次可能會把06年的某些老題稍加改動出一個“半新題”，沒想到劍橋委員會出題的考官如此之懶，題目連一個字都沒改就直接搬過來了。
這次能夠精確命中，再證明了我之前提出的觀點：如果劍橋委員會要出老題的話，一般會選擇2－3年前的題目。所以對于今年要參加考試的烤鴨來說，記?。翰灰倌脛?－劍6上的作文題目來當練習的素材了－那些題目永遠也不會再考到了，以2005－2006年考過的真題作為練筆的題目才是明智的做法！(我的博客上有2006年全年的題目，2005年由于年代久遠故未能收集完全)
接下來分析一下這次的考題，應該說上過我的作文課的學生會發(fā)現這次的題目不難寫，因為我在課上重點分析過類似的題目。從結構上來說，這個題目毫無疑問適合用“三對一”結構來進行寫作。以下為參考結構：
第一段：開頭段
Introduce the topic (改寫題目)
Statement (表明自己觀點－Abandon non-essential flight這種做法弊大于利)
第二段：讓步段 （承認這種做法有一定的合理性－節(jié)省燃料消耗，減少環(huán)境污染）
第三段：重點段 (論證這種做法會帶來更多問題)
第一句：過渡句
第二句：分論點一
The practice potentially hinders the economic development in most countries. （需論證）
第三句: Theoretical Evidence （理論論證分論點1）
Abandonning non-essential flight－Employees in related fileds such as international tourist guides are likelty to become unemployed－Soaring unemployement rate－Economic development suffers
第四句: 分論點二
The practice is likely to bring about great financial disaster to some countries whose economy relies on tourism to a large extent. (需論證)
第五句：Case Evidence (舉例論證分論點二)
可以以馬爾代夫這樣的國家為例。
第六句： 分論點三
The practice is also likely to cost people much more time on traveling, especially to some business people who need constantly travel from place to place. (Self-evident，無需論證)
第四段：結尾段
Summarize the nature of the practice－The problems outnumber the benefits
Restate the opinion－The practice is not a wise decision.
A long-distance flight consumes the fuel as much as a car consumes in several years time, and causes the same amount of pollution as cars. So some people think we should abandon the non-essential fights (such as for tourism), and it is more efficient than restricting the car use. Give your opinion about it.
再來看看我4月1號發(fā)表的預測里面三級預測的例題：
Long-distance flights are causing serious environmental problems today. Some people say that we should ban air travel totally in order to save the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
可以看到兩個題目非常相像，原因在于這次考的題目事實上是2006年3月25日考過的老題，我本來預測這次可能會把06年的某些老題稍加改動出一個“半新題”，沒想到劍橋委員會出題的考官如此之懶，題目連一個字都沒改就直接搬過來了。
這次能夠精確命中，再證明了我之前提出的觀點：如果劍橋委員會要出老題的話，一般會選擇2－3年前的題目。所以對于今年要參加考試的烤鴨來說，記?。翰灰倌脛?－劍6上的作文題目來當練習的素材了－那些題目永遠也不會再考到了，以2005－2006年考過的真題作為練筆的題目才是明智的做法！(我的博客上有2006年全年的題目，2005年由于年代久遠故未能收集完全)
接下來分析一下這次的考題，應該說上過我的作文課的學生會發(fā)現這次的題目不難寫，因為我在課上重點分析過類似的題目。從結構上來說，這個題目毫無疑問適合用“三對一”結構來進行寫作。以下為參考結構：
第一段：開頭段
Introduce the topic (改寫題目)
Statement (表明自己觀點－Abandon non-essential flight這種做法弊大于利)
第二段：讓步段 （承認這種做法有一定的合理性－節(jié)省燃料消耗，減少環(huán)境污染）
第三段：重點段 (論證這種做法會帶來更多問題)
第一句：過渡句
第二句：分論點一
The practice potentially hinders the economic development in most countries. （需論證）
第三句: Theoretical Evidence （理論論證分論點1）
Abandonning non-essential flight－Employees in related fileds such as international tourist guides are likelty to become unemployed－Soaring unemployement rate－Economic development suffers
第四句: 分論點二
The practice is likely to bring about great financial disaster to some countries whose economy relies on tourism to a large extent. (需論證)
第五句：Case Evidence (舉例論證分論點二)
可以以馬爾代夫這樣的國家為例。
第六句： 分論點三
The practice is also likely to cost people much more time on traveling, especially to some business people who need constantly travel from place to place. (Self-evident，無需論證)
第四段：結尾段
Summarize the nature of the practice－The problems outnumber the benefits
Restate the opinion－The practice is not a wise decision.