Unit 4 （1997年）
Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful，ground-clearing way to start.（71）Actually，it isnt，because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights，which is something the world does not have.
On one view of rights，to be sure，it necessarily follows that animals have none.72）Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract，as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore，animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd，for exactly the same reason，so is the idea that tigers have rights. However，this is only one account，and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—for instance，to infants，the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition，it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says “I don't like this contract?”
The point is this without agreement on the rights of people，arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless.（73）It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans，or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another，more fundamental question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?
Many deny it.（74）Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect，extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.
This view，which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood，may seem bravely “l(fā)ogical.”In fact it is simply shallow: the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh others interests against one s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough，for most，to engage sympathy.（75）When that happens，it is not a mistake: it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action，an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
Unit 4 翻譯題解：
71） Actually, it isn't, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
Actually, it isn't, because it assumes / that there is an agreed account of human rights, / which is something the world does not have.
第二、句子主干結(jié)構(gòu)是主從復(fù)合句。
1）because引導(dǎo)原因狀語(yǔ)從句
2）that引導(dǎo)賓語(yǔ)從句，從句中是存在句結(jié)構(gòu)there is an agreed account of human rights,
3）which從句的先行詞是human rights，something后面是定語(yǔ)從句the world does not have.
第三、詞的處理：
Actually 事實(shí)上；it主語(yǔ)代詞，根據(jù)上下文意思這種問(wèn)法，這種說(shuō)法，isn't后面省略的詞應(yīng)該是so或true；an agreed account 約定的看法，共同的認(rèn)識(shí)；human rights 人的權(quán)利，人權(quán)
完整的譯文：
71）事實(shí)并非如此，因?yàn)檫@種問(wèn)法是以人們對(duì)人的權(quán)利有共同的認(rèn)識(shí)為基礎(chǔ)的，而這種共同認(rèn)識(shí)并不存在。
72） Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
Some philosophers argue / that rights exist only within a social contract, / as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements.
第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)：
1）主干結(jié)構(gòu)是主從復(fù)合句：Some philosophers argue that……
2）that引導(dǎo)的是賓語(yǔ)從句
3）as part of……是賓語(yǔ)從句中的rights的主語(yǔ)補(bǔ)足語(yǔ)。
第三、詞的處理：
argue 論證；a social contract 社會(huì)契約；as part of 作為（是）……的一部分 entitlements 利益，權(quán)利
完整的譯文：
72）有些哲學(xué)家論證說(shuō)，權(quán)利只存在社會(huì)契約中，是責(zé)任與利益相交換的一部分。
73） It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: / it invites you to think that animals should be treated / either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all.
第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)是：
1）it invites you to think that……后面是賓語(yǔ)從句。
2） animals should be treated either with……, or with……要么……要么……，是表示選擇的方式狀語(yǔ)。
3）the consideration后面的humans extend to other humans是定語(yǔ)。
第三、詞的處理：
leads ……to extremes 引向極端；at the outset 從一開始；invites you to think 使人們認(rèn)為 ；consideration 關(guān)切，體諒；humans extend to other humans 人對(duì)待人
完整的譯文：
73）這種說(shuō)法從一開始就將討論引向兩個(gè)極端，它使人們認(rèn)為應(yīng)這樣對(duì)待動(dòng)物：要么像對(duì)人類自身一樣關(guān)切體諒，要么完全冷漠無(wú)情。
74） Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, / extremists of this kind think / that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.
第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)：
1）主干結(jié)構(gòu)是現(xiàn)在分詞短語(yǔ)狀語(yǔ)，主語(yǔ)+謂語(yǔ)+賓語(yǔ)從句。Arguing from……現(xiàn)在分詞短語(yǔ)作狀語(yǔ)。
2） the view和后面的從句that……是同位語(yǔ)關(guān)系
3） that……引導(dǎo)賓語(yǔ)從句。
第三、詞的處理：
Arguing from the view 從……觀點(diǎn)看，持……觀點(diǎn)；different from…… 與……不同；in every relevant respect 在各相關(guān)方面；extremists 極端主義者，持極端觀點(diǎn)的人；lie outside the area of moral choice 不在道德問(wèn)題范圍，與道德取舍無(wú)關(guān)
完整的譯文：
74）這類人持極端看法，認(rèn)為人與動(dòng)物在各相關(guān)方面都不相同，對(duì)待動(dòng)物無(wú)須考慮道德問(wèn)題。
75） When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
When that happens, it is not a mistake: / it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action, / an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
第二、句子主干結(jié)構(gòu)是兩個(gè)復(fù)合句：
1）When……是前一個(gè)復(fù)合句的時(shí)間狀語(yǔ)
2）instinct后面的介詞短語(yǔ)for moral reasoning in action是它的定語(yǔ)
3）that……是定語(yǔ)從句，修飾先行詞an instinct，從句中是被動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)，表示選擇。
第三、詞的處理：
that （代詞作主語(yǔ)）聯(lián)系上下文譯為這種反應(yīng)；mankind's instinct for moral reasoning 人類道德觀念推理的本能；in action 起作用；rather than 而不。
完整的譯文：
75）這種反應(yīng)并不錯(cuò)，這是人類用道德觀念進(jìn)行推理的本能在起作用，這種本能應(yīng)得到鼓勵(lì)而不應(yīng)遭到嘲弄。
Do animals have rights? This is how the question is usually put. It sounds like a useful，ground-clearing way to start.（71）Actually，it isnt，because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights，which is something the world does not have.
On one view of rights，to be sure，it necessarily follows that animals have none.72）Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract，as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements. Therefore，animals cannot have rights. The idea of punishing a tiger that kills somebody is absurd，for exactly the same reason，so is the idea that tigers have rights. However，this is only one account，and by no means an uncontested one. It denies rights not only to animals but also to some people—for instance，to infants，the mentally incapable and future generations. In addition，it is unclear what force a contract can have for people who never consented to it: how do you reply to somebody who says “I don't like this contract?”
The point is this without agreement on the rights of people，arguing about the rights of animals is fruitless.（73）It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans，or with no consideration at all. This is a false choice. Better to start with another，more fundamental question: is the way we treat animals a moral issue at all?
Many deny it.（74）Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect，extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice. Any regard for the suffering of animals is seen as a mistake—a sentimental displacement of feeling that should properly be directed to other humans.
This view，which holds that torturing a monkey is morally equivalent to chopping wood，may seem bravely “l(fā)ogical.”In fact it is simply shallow: the ethical equivalent of learning to crawl—is to weigh others interests against one s own. This in turn requires sympathy and imagination: without which there is no capacity for moral thought. To see an animal in pain is enough，for most，to engage sympathy.（75）When that happens，it is not a mistake: it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action，an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
Unit 4 翻譯題解：
71） Actually, it isn't, because it assumes that there is an agreed account of human rights, which is something the world does not have.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
Actually, it isn't, because it assumes / that there is an agreed account of human rights, / which is something the world does not have.
第二、句子主干結(jié)構(gòu)是主從復(fù)合句。
1）because引導(dǎo)原因狀語(yǔ)從句
2）that引導(dǎo)賓語(yǔ)從句，從句中是存在句結(jié)構(gòu)there is an agreed account of human rights,
3）which從句的先行詞是human rights，something后面是定語(yǔ)從句the world does not have.
第三、詞的處理：
Actually 事實(shí)上；it主語(yǔ)代詞，根據(jù)上下文意思這種問(wèn)法，這種說(shuō)法，isn't后面省略的詞應(yīng)該是so或true；an agreed account 約定的看法，共同的認(rèn)識(shí)；human rights 人的權(quán)利，人權(quán)
完整的譯文：
71）事實(shí)并非如此，因?yàn)檫@種問(wèn)法是以人們對(duì)人的權(quán)利有共同的認(rèn)識(shí)為基礎(chǔ)的，而這種共同認(rèn)識(shí)并不存在。
72） Some philosophers argue that rights exist only within a social contract, as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
Some philosophers argue / that rights exist only within a social contract, / as part of an exchange of duties and entitlements.
第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)：
1）主干結(jié)構(gòu)是主從復(fù)合句：Some philosophers argue that……
2）that引導(dǎo)的是賓語(yǔ)從句
3）as part of……是賓語(yǔ)從句中的rights的主語(yǔ)補(bǔ)足語(yǔ)。
第三、詞的處理：
argue 論證；a social contract 社會(huì)契約；as part of 作為（是）……的一部分 entitlements 利益，權(quán)利
完整的譯文：
72）有些哲學(xué)家論證說(shuō)，權(quán)利只存在社會(huì)契約中，是責(zé)任與利益相交換的一部分。
73） It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: it invites you to think that animals should be treated either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
It leads the discussion to extremes at the outset: / it invites you to think that animals should be treated / either with the consideration humans extend to other humans, or with no consideration at all.
第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)是：
1）it invites you to think that……后面是賓語(yǔ)從句。
2） animals should be treated either with……, or with……要么……要么……，是表示選擇的方式狀語(yǔ)。
3）the consideration后面的humans extend to other humans是定語(yǔ)。
第三、詞的處理：
leads ……to extremes 引向極端；at the outset 從一開始；invites you to think 使人們認(rèn)為 ；consideration 關(guān)切，體諒；humans extend to other humans 人對(duì)待人
完整的譯文：
73）這種說(shuō)法從一開始就將討論引向兩個(gè)極端，它使人們認(rèn)為應(yīng)這樣對(duì)待動(dòng)物：要么像對(duì)人類自身一樣關(guān)切體諒，要么完全冷漠無(wú)情。
74） Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, extremists of this kind think that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
Arguing from the view that humans are different from animals in every relevant respect, / extremists of this kind think / that animals lie outside the area of moral choice.
第二、句子的結(jié)構(gòu)：
1）主干結(jié)構(gòu)是現(xiàn)在分詞短語(yǔ)狀語(yǔ)，主語(yǔ)+謂語(yǔ)+賓語(yǔ)從句。Arguing from……現(xiàn)在分詞短語(yǔ)作狀語(yǔ)。
2） the view和后面的從句that……是同位語(yǔ)關(guān)系
3） that……引導(dǎo)賓語(yǔ)從句。
第三、詞的處理：
Arguing from the view 從……觀點(diǎn)看，持……觀點(diǎn)；different from…… 與……不同；in every relevant respect 在各相關(guān)方面；extremists 極端主義者，持極端觀點(diǎn)的人；lie outside the area of moral choice 不在道德問(wèn)題范圍，與道德取舍無(wú)關(guān)
完整的譯文：
74）這類人持極端看法，認(rèn)為人與動(dòng)物在各相關(guān)方面都不相同，對(duì)待動(dòng)物無(wú)須考慮道德問(wèn)題。
75） When that happens, it is not a mistake: it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action, an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
句子分析：
第一、句子可以拆分為三段：
When that happens, it is not a mistake: / it is mankind's instinct for moral reasoning in action, / an instinct that should be encouraged rather than laughed at.
第二、句子主干結(jié)構(gòu)是兩個(gè)復(fù)合句：
1）When……是前一個(gè)復(fù)合句的時(shí)間狀語(yǔ)
2）instinct后面的介詞短語(yǔ)for moral reasoning in action是它的定語(yǔ)
3）that……是定語(yǔ)從句，修飾先行詞an instinct，從句中是被動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)，表示選擇。
第三、詞的處理：
that （代詞作主語(yǔ)）聯(lián)系上下文譯為這種反應(yīng)；mankind's instinct for moral reasoning 人類道德觀念推理的本能；in action 起作用；rather than 而不。
完整的譯文：
75）這種反應(yīng)并不錯(cuò)，這是人類用道德觀念進(jìn)行推理的本能在起作用，這種本能應(yīng)得到鼓勵(lì)而不應(yīng)遭到嘲弄。