1、避免使用反問(wèn)句、設(shè)問(wèn)句。特別是作者也沒(méi)有答案的問(wèn)題。
例如： What's the objective of the information? Is it to make people more confused and astray? I partly agree with the author's contention that the enormous and otiose information sometimes render people lose their way and fail to consider question penetratingly and originally.
在作文的開(kāi)頭就扔出兩個(gè)問(wèn)題，然后接下來(lái)的陳述卻與問(wèn)題基本毫無(wú)干系。作為讀者，首先要考慮那兩個(gè)問(wèn)題的答案到底是什么，然后才能往下讀。這些在中文里可能會(huì)被評(píng)作“引人入勝”的好詞好句，在英語(yǔ)的論文寫(xiě)作里面，可以說(shuō)是的敗筆之一。如果你一定要問(wèn)問(wèn)題的話(huà)，那就改成陳述句式，例如：Whether this issue is right or wrong? 可以改成：It has been a controversial issue that……
2、避免集中使用"Be"動(dòng)詞，包括is, are, has been, have been, etc.
即使GRE考題statement里面有很多"Be"動(dòng)詞，你也要避免照抄，因?yàn)閟tatement是淺顯地告訴你一個(gè)idea，而不是向你展示writing。
例如： What's the objective of the information? Is it to make people more confused and astray? I partly agree with the author's contention that the enormous and otiose information sometimes render people lose their way and fail to consider question penetratingly and originally.
在作文的開(kāi)頭就扔出兩個(gè)問(wèn)題，然后接下來(lái)的陳述卻與問(wèn)題基本毫無(wú)干系。作為讀者，首先要考慮那兩個(gè)問(wèn)題的答案到底是什么，然后才能往下讀。這些在中文里可能會(huì)被評(píng)作“引人入勝”的好詞好句，在英語(yǔ)的論文寫(xiě)作里面，可以說(shuō)是的敗筆之一。如果你一定要問(wèn)問(wèn)題的話(huà)，那就改成陳述句式，例如：Whether this issue is right or wrong? 可以改成：It has been a controversial issue that……
2、避免集中使用"Be"動(dòng)詞，包括is, are, has been, have been, etc.
即使GRE考題statement里面有很多"Be"動(dòng)詞，你也要避免照抄，因?yàn)閟tatement是淺顯地告訴你一個(gè)idea，而不是向你展示writing。