GRE，全稱(chēng)Graduate Record Examination，中文名稱(chēng)為美國(guó)研究生入學(xué)考試，適用于除法律與商業(yè)外的各專(zhuān)業(yè)。由美國(guó)教育考試服務(wù)處(Educational Testing Service，簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)ETS)主辦，GRE是美國(guó)、加拿大的大學(xué)各類(lèi)研究生院（除管理類(lèi)學(xué)院，法學(xué)院）要求申請(qǐng)者所必須具備的一個(gè)考試成績(jī)，也是教授對(duì)申請(qǐng)者是否授予獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金所依據(jù)的最重要的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 另有，Generic Routing Encapsulation（通用路由封裝）也簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)GRE。
FROMWHENCESHOULDCURRICULUMCOME?
"Itisunfortunatethattoday’seducatorsplacesomuchemphasisonfindingoutwhatstudentswanttoincludeinthecurriculumandthengivingittothem.Itistheeducator’sdutytodeterminethecurriculumandthestudents’dutytostudywhatispresentedtothem."
Asanelementaryeducator,Ibelievethisstanceisextremist.Educatorsandthepublicmustcometoamiddleroad.Thehighroadandthelowroadareintimatedinthisstatement.Ibelievethehighroadonthistopic(fromwhenceshouldcurriculumcome)representsanouveauapproach.Askthestudentswhattheywanttolearnandstudyfortheyear;thenmeander,researchandbranchoffoftheirinterests.Thelowroadonthistopic(directlyendorsedbythisstatement)isoldfashionedandoutdated.Theassumptionsbehindthisviewincludeamagicalabilitybyteacherstoinfusereamsofinformation,dataandknowledgeintostudents’brainsthatthenbecomeinternalizedandappliedbythestudents.
Inacomplexandfrighteningsociety,wemustlooktothemiddleroad.Wemustinfusethebestofthehighandthelowroads.Currentresearchhashadalottosayoncurriculumdevelopment.Overreachingargumentsdefendthequalityofstudents’self-directedlearning.However,inordertoprepareourstudentsforthissociety,wemusthavedevelopedthebackboneandanchorforcurriculum.Contentandperformancestandards(i.e.curricula)needtobedevelopedbythedistrict’seducatorsasamapforteachers.WheneducatorsprovidestudentswithchoicesWITHINthemapofcurriculum,studentsrelishinthefreedomandtakeownershipfortheirlearning.
Werewetoprovidestudentstheultimateauthorityincurriculumdevelopment,wewouldbedoinganinjusticenotonlytoourstudentsbuttosocietyasawhole.Therearespecificskillsandabilitiesthatneedtobedevelopedandtaught--regardlessofstudents’(orforthatmatter,teachers’)interest.Inmyprofessionasanelementaryeducatorandasaparent,Ivaluetheabilitiestoread,writeandbemathematicallyproficient.Thosestudentsnotmasteringthosecriticalskillsareatadisadvantage.Weseethosestudentsbecomedestructiveordepressed.Ihaveobservedstudentsstrugglingwiththebasicsbecomeoutcastsintheirownlittleworlds.Veryyoungoutcastsgrowintoadultoutcasts. 外語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)網(wǎng)
IdoNOTthinkitisunfortunatethattoday’seducatorsemphasizestudents’interests.ItISourduty,however,toprovidetheparametersfortheireducation.Wecannotsimplystatethateducatorsdeterminecurriculumandstudentsfollow.Thisisjustnotrealityintheclassrooms.Whenstandardsandcurricularmapshavebeendeveloped,teachersoftoday’schildrenhavetheresponsibility(yes,theduty!)tobringlifetothosemaps.Onecrucialandsuccessfulway,istoprovidestudentsvarietyandchoiceswithinthecontextof"whatneedstobecovered."Theeducatorwhobringscurriculatolifeforherstudentsandgivesherstudentstheresponsibilitytomakechoiceshelpstoprepareourchildrenforthriving--notjustsurviving.
COMMENTARY
Thisresponsepresentsawell-developedanalysisoftheissueanddisplaysstrongcontroloftheelementsofwriting.Theessayarguesinfavorofa"middleroad"positionontheissuebyanalyzingtheprosandconsofbothteacher-determinedandstudent-drivencurricula.Theargumentisclearandwellfocused,supportedwithfirst-handexperienceandtheresultsofeducationalresearch.
Thewriterendorsesacurriculumthatemphasizesstrongbasicskills(reading,writing,andmath)andremindsthereaderthattheteachers’ultimateresponsibilityshouldbetobringcurriculatolifeinorderto"prepareourchildrenforthriving--notjustsurviving."
ThisessaydisplaysastrongfacilitywithwrittenEnglishlanguage;thecarefulchoiceofwordsandcarefullystructuredparagraphshelpunifythestructureoftheargument.Overall,thisresponsedisplaysastrongcommandofacademicwritingskillsandthusreceivedascoreof5. 感謝您閱讀《歷年GRE考試Issue主題范文及評(píng)析26 》一文，出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
FROMWHENCESHOULDCURRICULUMCOME?
"Itisunfortunatethattoday’seducatorsplacesomuchemphasisonfindingoutwhatstudentswanttoincludeinthecurriculumandthengivingittothem.Itistheeducator’sdutytodeterminethecurriculumandthestudents’dutytostudywhatispresentedtothem."
Asanelementaryeducator,Ibelievethisstanceisextremist.Educatorsandthepublicmustcometoamiddleroad.Thehighroadandthelowroadareintimatedinthisstatement.Ibelievethehighroadonthistopic(fromwhenceshouldcurriculumcome)representsanouveauapproach.Askthestudentswhattheywanttolearnandstudyfortheyear;thenmeander,researchandbranchoffoftheirinterests.Thelowroadonthistopic(directlyendorsedbythisstatement)isoldfashionedandoutdated.Theassumptionsbehindthisviewincludeamagicalabilitybyteacherstoinfusereamsofinformation,dataandknowledgeintostudents’brainsthatthenbecomeinternalizedandappliedbythestudents.
Inacomplexandfrighteningsociety,wemustlooktothemiddleroad.Wemustinfusethebestofthehighandthelowroads.Currentresearchhashadalottosayoncurriculumdevelopment.Overreachingargumentsdefendthequalityofstudents’self-directedlearning.However,inordertoprepareourstudentsforthissociety,wemusthavedevelopedthebackboneandanchorforcurriculum.Contentandperformancestandards(i.e.curricula)needtobedevelopedbythedistrict’seducatorsasamapforteachers.WheneducatorsprovidestudentswithchoicesWITHINthemapofcurriculum,studentsrelishinthefreedomandtakeownershipfortheirlearning.
Werewetoprovidestudentstheultimateauthorityincurriculumdevelopment,wewouldbedoinganinjusticenotonlytoourstudentsbuttosocietyasawhole.Therearespecificskillsandabilitiesthatneedtobedevelopedandtaught--regardlessofstudents’(orforthatmatter,teachers’)interest.Inmyprofessionasanelementaryeducatorandasaparent,Ivaluetheabilitiestoread,writeandbemathematicallyproficient.Thosestudentsnotmasteringthosecriticalskillsareatadisadvantage.Weseethosestudentsbecomedestructiveordepressed.Ihaveobservedstudentsstrugglingwiththebasicsbecomeoutcastsintheirownlittleworlds.Veryyoungoutcastsgrowintoadultoutcasts. 外語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)網(wǎng)
IdoNOTthinkitisunfortunatethattoday’seducatorsemphasizestudents’interests.ItISourduty,however,toprovidetheparametersfortheireducation.Wecannotsimplystatethateducatorsdeterminecurriculumandstudentsfollow.Thisisjustnotrealityintheclassrooms.Whenstandardsandcurricularmapshavebeendeveloped,teachersoftoday’schildrenhavetheresponsibility(yes,theduty!)tobringlifetothosemaps.Onecrucialandsuccessfulway,istoprovidestudentsvarietyandchoiceswithinthecontextof"whatneedstobecovered."Theeducatorwhobringscurriculatolifeforherstudentsandgivesherstudentstheresponsibilitytomakechoiceshelpstoprepareourchildrenforthriving--notjustsurviving.
COMMENTARY
Thisresponsepresentsawell-developedanalysisoftheissueanddisplaysstrongcontroloftheelementsofwriting.Theessayarguesinfavorofa"middleroad"positionontheissuebyanalyzingtheprosandconsofbothteacher-determinedandstudent-drivencurricula.Theargumentisclearandwellfocused,supportedwithfirst-handexperienceandtheresultsofeducationalresearch.
Thewriterendorsesacurriculumthatemphasizesstrongbasicskills(reading,writing,andmath)andremindsthereaderthattheteachers’ultimateresponsibilityshouldbetobringcurriculatolifeinorderto"prepareourchildrenforthriving--notjustsurviving."
ThisessaydisplaysastrongfacilitywithwrittenEnglishlanguage;thecarefulchoiceofwordsandcarefullystructuredparagraphshelpunifythestructureoftheargument.Overall,thisresponsedisplaysastrongcommandofacademicwritingskillsandthusreceivedascoreof5. 感謝您閱讀《歷年GRE考試Issue主題范文及評(píng)析26 》一文，出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。