GRE寫作成為橫在中國學生的理想和現(xiàn)實之間的一大障礙，因此，如何攻克寫作這道屏障，成為擺在我們面前的首要任務。
gre argument 165 提綱參考
The following appeared in a business magazine. "As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness暈眩and nausea惡心, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all,contain chemicals that posed a health risk. This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods."
1. Promofoods concludes that the cans did not contain chemicals that posed a health risk., which rests several gratuitous assumptions. First, the arguer points out that chemists did find three chemicals that most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea. However, the arguer does not provide any information that the quantity of these three chemical and whether these may do harms to the health of customers or not. Perhaps…
2. Besides, the chemists only tested 8 chemicals which commonly cause the symptoms of dizziness and nausea. Thus, this action may lead to neglect other factors which may also lead to dizziness and nausea and even bring about damages to the health of customers.
3.即使說那些沒害，且不含其他元素，該公司是不是出了其他產(chǎn)品，而這些產(chǎn)品導致顧客那些問題;而有沒有經(jīng)受檢查
感謝您閱讀《argument165提綱參考 》一文，出國留學網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
gre argument 165 提綱參考
The following appeared in a business magazine. "As a result of numerous consumer complaints of dizziness暈眩and nausea惡心, Promofoods requested that eight million cans of tuna be returned for testing last year. Promofoods concluded that the cans did not, after all,contain chemicals that posed a health risk. This conclusion is based on the fact that the chemists from Promofoods tested samples of the recalled cans and found that, of the eight chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find that the three remaining suspected chemicals are naturally found in all other kinds of canned foods."
1. Promofoods concludes that the cans did not contain chemicals that posed a health risk., which rests several gratuitous assumptions. First, the arguer points out that chemists did find three chemicals that most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea. However, the arguer does not provide any information that the quantity of these three chemical and whether these may do harms to the health of customers or not. Perhaps…
2. Besides, the chemists only tested 8 chemicals which commonly cause the symptoms of dizziness and nausea. Thus, this action may lead to neglect other factors which may also lead to dizziness and nausea and even bring about damages to the health of customers.
3.即使說那些沒害，且不含其他元素，該公司是不是出了其他產(chǎn)品，而這些產(chǎn)品導致顧客那些問題;而有沒有經(jīng)受檢查
感謝您閱讀《argument165提綱參考 》一文，出國留學網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。