本文主要講解GRE作文相關(guān)內(nèi)容，希望能幫助童鞋們提高寫作能力。出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)liuxue86.com編輯部敬上。
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues.
"Over the past year， the Crust Copper Company （CCC） has purchased over 10，000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and， since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered animal species， in environmental disaster. But such disasters can be prevented if consumers simply refuse to purchase products that are made with CCC's copper unless the company abandons its mining plans."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻譯：
去年，CCC公司在熱帶國家West Fredonia購買了上萬平方英里的土地。在這些地方采礦將會不可避免地導(dǎo)致污染和環(huán)境災(zāi)害，因為West Fredonia是很多瀕危物種的棲居地。但如果消費者簡單地拒絕購買用CCC所生產(chǎn)的銅而制造的產(chǎn)品，直到CCC放棄它的采礦計劃就可以避免這種災(zāi)害。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中檢視文章的論證中述及和/或未明確述及的假設(shè)，務(wù)請解釋文章的論證是如何依賴于這些假設(shè)的，并指出如果這些假設(shè)不成立會對文章的論證帶來何種影響。
感謝您閱讀《argument44 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues.
"Over the past year， the Crust Copper Company （CCC） has purchased over 10，000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and， since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered animal species， in environmental disaster. But such disasters can be prevented if consumers simply refuse to purchase products that are made with CCC's copper unless the company abandons its mining plans."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
中文翻譯：
去年，CCC公司在熱帶國家West Fredonia購買了上萬平方英里的土地。在這些地方采礦將會不可避免地導(dǎo)致污染和環(huán)境災(zāi)害，因為West Fredonia是很多瀕危物種的棲居地。但如果消費者簡單地拒絕購買用CCC所生產(chǎn)的銅而制造的產(chǎn)品，直到CCC放棄它的采礦計劃就可以避免這種災(zāi)害。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中檢視文章的論證中述及和/或未明確述及的假設(shè)，務(wù)請解釋文章的論證是如何依賴于這些假設(shè)的，并指出如果這些假設(shè)不成立會對文章的論證帶來何種影響。
感謝您閱讀《argument44 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。