GRE，全稱Graduate Record Examination，中文名稱為美國(guó)研究生入學(xué)考試，適用于除法律與商業(yè)外的各專業(yè)。由美國(guó)教育考試服務(wù)處(Educational Testing Service，簡(jiǎn)稱ETS)主辦，GRE是美國(guó)、加拿大的大學(xué)各類研究生院（除管理類學(xué)院，法學(xué)院）要求申請(qǐng)者所必須具備的一個(gè)考試成績(jī)，也是教授對(duì)申請(qǐng)者是否授予獎(jiǎng)學(xué)金所依據(jù)的最重要的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 另有，Generic Routing Encapsulation（通用路由封裝）也簡(jiǎn)稱GRE。
This argument recommends commissioning a famous architect known for futuristic and
experimental designs as the best means of providing new affordable housing for Claitown
University students. The argument's line of reasoning is that the building will attract paying
tourists, new students, and donations from alumni all of which will help raise the funds
needed for the project. However, the argument is problematic in several critical respects.
First of all, a famous architect might charge a substantial fee for the project, in which case
the funds raised by charging tourists and through alumni donations might be offset to the point
of rendering the entire project unfeasible financially. The argument's proponent must address
this issue before I can accept the argument's conclusion.
Secondly, the argument relies on the tenuous assumption that tourists will be interested in
paying for tours of a building used for a purpose as mundane as student housing. It is entirely
possible that once the building is in use, tourists will not be willing to pay for tours. Besides,
198
perhaps the appeal of this architect's buildings lies primarily in their exteriors, in which case
tourists would be able to appreciate the new building's salient architectural features without
paying for a tour. In either case, the argument's claim that the architect's notoriety and the
building itself will generate the funds needed for its construction would be dubious at best. 感謝您閱讀《GRE作文范文大全（117） 》一文，出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
This argument recommends commissioning a famous architect known for futuristic and
experimental designs as the best means of providing new affordable housing for Claitown
University students. The argument's line of reasoning is that the building will attract paying
tourists, new students, and donations from alumni all of which will help raise the funds
needed for the project. However, the argument is problematic in several critical respects.
First of all, a famous architect might charge a substantial fee for the project, in which case
the funds raised by charging tourists and through alumni donations might be offset to the point
of rendering the entire project unfeasible financially. The argument's proponent must address
this issue before I can accept the argument's conclusion.
Secondly, the argument relies on the tenuous assumption that tourists will be interested in
paying for tours of a building used for a purpose as mundane as student housing. It is entirely
possible that once the building is in use, tourists will not be willing to pay for tours. Besides,
198
perhaps the appeal of this architect's buildings lies primarily in their exteriors, in which case
tourists would be able to appreciate the new building's salient architectural features without
paying for a tour. In either case, the argument's claim that the architect's notoriety and the
building itself will generate the funds needed for its construction would be dubious at best. 感謝您閱讀《GRE作文范文大全（117） 》一文，出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。