GRE作文是中國學(xué)生比較頭痛的，經(jīng)常準(zhǔn)備很多時間最后還是只得到3.5。我之所以得到6分，個人認(rèn)為我的文風(fēng)比較淳樸扎實，有科學(xué)性，寫的思路比較廣(正、反、特)，字?jǐn)?shù)也比較多(I800+、A700+)。
題目：
The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper.
"Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway， adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute， it is argued， thereby reducing rush-hour traffic."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻譯：
乘客抱怨在郊區(qū)與市中心的B高速公路的更長交通高峰期使他們在路上的時間多花了一倍。 一個駕駛協(xié)會的不錯建議是拓寬高速公路，修建一條附加機動車道。但反對者卻說去年臨近的G高速采用了相同的方法后交通狀況更加惡化。他們建議一種更好的建議是在B高速上修一條自行車道。很多的當(dāng)?shù)厝硕际亲孕熊噽酆谜?。一條新的自行車道將會激勵他們騎自行車外出，這樣的方式會減少高峰時間的交通流量。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。
感謝您閱讀《argument29 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。
題目：
The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper.
"Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway， adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute， it is argued， thereby reducing rush-hour traffic."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻譯：
乘客抱怨在郊區(qū)與市中心的B高速公路的更長交通高峰期使他們在路上的時間多花了一倍。 一個駕駛協(xié)會的不錯建議是拓寬高速公路，修建一條附加機動車道。但反對者卻說去年臨近的G高速采用了相同的方法后交通狀況更加惡化。他們建議一種更好的建議是在B高速上修一條自行車道。很多的當(dāng)?shù)厝硕际亲孕熊噽酆谜?。一條新的自行車道將會激勵他們騎自行車外出，這樣的方式會減少高峰時間的交通流量。
寫一篇回應(yīng)，在其中討論還有哪些問題需要被回答才能決定文中的推薦是否能得到預(yù)期結(jié)果，并務(wù)請解釋對這些問題的回答是如何幫助更好的評估文中的建議的。
感謝您閱讀《argument29 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。